Nezam El-Tayebat Fact CheckA scientific assessment of the “نظام الطيبات” nutrition system
Choose country

Mostly false Certainty of evidence: low provisional C-CAN-05

Cancer patients do not die of cancer itself but of wasting and cortisone (hormonal disturbance).

Safety note: Unintended weight loss during cancer needs prompt medical and dietetic attention. Cachexia is driven by the tumour; it is not a reason to refuse or stop recommended cancer treatment. Decisions about treatment belong with the oncology team.
Conclusion: Cancer wasting is caused by the cancer; this is not a separate cause of death.
  1. Original statement
  2. Scientific assessment
  3. In plain language
  4. Studies on this claim
  5. Regional context
  6. What applies in my country?
  7. References

Original statement

كل عانين السرطان ما بيموتو بسرطان اصلا بيموتوا بايه بكشكش يا هزال الكورتيزون

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

Cancer patients do not die of cancer itself but of wasting and cortisone (hormonal disturbance).

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
السرطان ١ (Open source)
Published
26 January 2025
Timestamp
0:44:54 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; spelling errors of the machine transcript are kept verbatim; wording may deviate from the spoken words.
Population concerned

Patients with advanced cancer

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Scientific assessment

Mostly false – Essential parts of the statement are not supported by the evidence or are strongly exaggerated.

Certainty of evidence: low – Further research is likely to change the assessment considerably.

1. What was claimed?

Death is due to wasting/cortisone, not cancer.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

Cachexia (wasting) is a frequent, serious feature of advanced cancer.

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

Cachexia is driven by the tumour's effects on appetite and metabolism and is not fully reversible by nutrition (I-CAN-06); it is part of dying of cancer, not an alternative to it. Organ failure from tumour spread is another major cause.

4. What remains unclear?

The share of cancer deaths in which cachexia is the leading clinical feature varies by cancer type and is not quantified in the source reviewed (I-CAN-06).

5. Which studies support it?

Partly: cachexia is a frequent and serious feature of advanced cancer (I-CAN-06). The 'cortisone' explanation is not supported.

6. Which studies contradict it?

I-CAN-06.

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Not region-specific; the same physiology and evidence apply.

8. What is known about Egypt?

Not region-specific; the same physiology and evidence apply.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Unintended weight loss in cancer needs prompt medical and dietetic attention.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

Cancer cachexia is defined as a tumour-driven syndrome that is not fully reversible by nutrition (I-CAN-06); separating 'wasting' from 'cancer' as a cause of death is therefore a false dichotomy, and no evidence was reviewed for cortisone as a general cause of cancer death. The correct kernel is that wasting is a frequent and serious feature of advanced cancer. Certainty low because only one consensus document was reviewed.

Source quality

Machine transcript.

Regional transferability

High.

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

Dr. Diaa said cancer patients die of wasting and cortisone, not of the cancer. Wasting is indeed common in advanced cancer, but it is caused by the cancer itself, which changes appetite and metabolism. Food alone cannot fully reverse it.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (1)

  • Cancer wasting is caused by the cancer itself

    Fearon K et al.. Lancet Oncol 2011 · PMID 21296615 · DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7
    Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Experts define cachexia as muscle loss driven by the tumour's effects on metabolism and appetite, not fully reversible by food.

    Cachexia is part of the cancer process

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Define cachexia.

    How was the study done?

    Delphi consensus.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Experts.

    What was actually found?

    Definition.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Weight loss in cancer needs medical attention.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Consensus.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts 'not dying of cancer'.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High.

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (0)

No studies in this group.

Regional context

Germany / EU

Not region-specific; the same physiology and evidence apply.

Egypt

Not region-specific; the same physiology and evidence apply.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Mostly false Cancer wasting is caused by the cancer; this is not a separate cause of death.

This statement concerns biological or medical relationships. The scientific assessment above applies regardless of the country; country-specific food data do not change it.

References

  1. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus.. Fearon K et al.. Lancet Oncol 2011 · PMID 21296615 · DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7

← Back to overview