Mostly false Certainty of evidence: very low provisional C-CHK-12

All poultry (chicken, duck, goose, turkey, chicken liver/gizzards) is forbidden because these are domesticated, ground-feeding birds that do not fly, whereas pigeon and quail are allowed; all eggs including quail and pigeon eggs are forbidden.

Conclusion: The rule allowing pigeon and quail but forbidding other poultry is not based on scientific evidence and is internally inconsistent.

Original statement

الوز والبط دواجن والداجن ده ... يقعد ياكل من الارض البيضه دي الفرخه والبطه والوزه ما يتاكلوش دي طيور زينه

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

All poultry (chicken, duck, goose, turkey, chicken liver/gizzards) is forbidden because these are domesticated, ground-feeding birds that do not fly, whereas pigeon and quail are allowed; all eggs including quail and pigeon eggs are forbidden.

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! لايف منتظر (Open source)
Published
8 February 2026
Timestamp
not available (transcript has no timings)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
Claimed mechanism

Domesticated birds that feed from the ground/their own waste and do not fly are unsuitable; pigeons eat only grains.

Claimed health effect

Same harms as chicken.

Population concerned

general population (not specified)

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Diverging source versions

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
بدأت قناة "Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي" بثًا مباشرًا Game Over 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 (Open source)
Published
13 March 2026
Timestamp
not available (transcript has no timings)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
بدأت قناة "Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي" بثًا مباشرًا ذكري يوم ميلادي 😂😂❤️❤️❤️ (Open source)
Published
26 March 2026
Timestamp
not available (transcript has no timings)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
الحلقة الثانية من بودكاست #بدون_إثـــــــارة_جدل مع الدكتور ضياء العوضي (Open source)
Published
28 November 2024
Timestamp
not available (transcript has no timings)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الهرم الغذائي الجديده (Open source)
Published
20 January 2026
Timestamp
not available (transcript has no timings)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
Source status
Third-party site (unofficial)
Attribution
Third-party site (altayybat.com); unofficial by its own statement
Origin
https://altayybat.com/ar/
Attribution uncertainty
Lowest attribution level; the site declares it is not affiliated with Dr. Diaa Elawady.
Source status
Third-party site (unofficial)
Attribution
Third-party site (mytayibat.com); unofficial by its own statement
Origin
https://mytayibat.com/forbidden
Attribution uncertainty
Lowest attribution level: unofficial third-party site. In its footer it calls itself the "official educational platform"; this self-description is not verified as authorised by the heirs or the archive.
Source status
Archive food list
Attribution
Archive food list (eltayebat.com)
Origin
https://eltayebat.com/foods/
Attribution uncertainty
Food-list entry; no reasoning or source given on the list itself.

الفراخ البلدي مثلا ايه مشكلتك ايه يعني فرق الفراخ البلدي ايه من الفراخ البيضا مافيش فرق يا بابا هو نفس الكائن

Village chicken, for example - what is your problem? What is the difference between village chicken and white chicken? There is no difference, it is the same creature.

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
لحظة مميزة من البث المباشر (Open source)
Published
6 April 2026
Timestamp
0:00:43 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; YouTube original not checked; wording may contain recognition errors. No transcript statement on pigeon or quail meat was located; altayybat allows grilled pigeon/quail while the archive list says 'poultry: avoid'.

Scientific assessment

Mostly false – Essential parts of the statement are not supported by the evidence or are strongly exaggerated.

Certainty of evidence: very low – Any assessment is very uncertain.

1. What was claimed?

Ground-feeding domestic poultry (chicken, duck, goose, turkey) and their livers/gizzards are forbidden; flying birds such as pigeon (and initially quail) are allowed; all eggs are forbidden.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

Feeding and husbandry can influence meat composition and contaminant exposure (e.g., outdoor/ground-feeding hens take up soil pollutants, A-EGG-05). Elawady himself acknowledged that farmed quail are also intensively fed, which undermines the original quail exception.

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

Domestic pigeons are also domesticated poultry raised in towers and fed by humans; quail are ground-dwelling birds commonly farmed intensively. Squabs carry Salmonella (6 of 45 = 13.3% in one study, mainly S. Typhimurium with multidrug resistance). No evidence shows that pigeon or quail meat is healthier than chicken. Lamb liver is allowed while chicken liver is forbidden, although liver from any species concentrates residues in the same way (e.g., Egyptian chicken livers had the highest antibiotic residues, I-CHK-12, but lamb liver was not compared).

4. What remains unclear?

Nutrient and contaminant differences between pigeon/quail and chicken under Egyptian conditions.

5. Which studies support it?

None for the distinction.

6. Which studies contradict it?

I-CHK-15 (Salmonella in squabs).

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Pigeon and quail are minor foods; EU hygiene rules apply to all poultry species.

8. What is known about Egypt?

Pigeon (often stuffed, 'حمام محشي') and quail are common traditional foods; pigeon towers and quail farms exist; avian influenza is enzootic in Egyptian poultry (I-CHK-10), which concerns all domestic birds handled alive.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

The criterion separating 'allowed' and 'forbidden' birds is not a food-safety or nutrition criterion; the same hygiene rules apply to all poultry.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

The distinction is based on a non-scientific criterion (flight/feeding behaviour); no study comparing health effects of pigeon/quail vs chicken/duck/turkey meat was found. Pigeons/squabs also carry Salmonella (13.3% of 45 squabs in one study). Certainty very low due to lack of direct comparative evidence.

Source quality

Own words (several transcripts) plus third-party lists; the official archive list does not specify pigeon/quail or liver species.

Regional transferability

The criterion is universal; pigeon (حمام) and quail are traditional foods in Egypt.

Individual exceptions

Not applicable.

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

The system forbids chicken, duck, goose and turkey, but allows pigeon and (sometimes) quail. Dr. Elawady explained that 'real' birds fly and that ground-feeding farm birds are unsuitable. Pigeons and quail are also raised and fed by people, and pigeons can carry Salmonella just like chickens. He himself later said he had not known that quail are farmed. There is no scientific evidence that pigeon or quail meat is healthier or safer than chicken.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (2)

  • Salmonella in young pigeons (squabs)

    Osman KM et al.. Rev Sci Tech 2014 · PMID 25812222 · DOI 10.20506/rst.33.3.2336
    Cross-sectional studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    About one in eight squabs carried Salmonella, often multidrug-resistant.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Serotypes, virulence genes and resistance of Salmonella from squabs

    How was the study done?

    Cross-sectional microbiological study of squabs

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    45 squabs; 6 isolates; Squabs (young pigeons)

    What was actually found?

    6/45 (13.3%) positive; S. Typhimurium 4/6; all isolates resistant to lincomycin and streptomycin; multidrug resistance profiles.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Descriptive

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Pigeon meat needs the same hygiene as chicken.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Small sample

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts pigeon exception.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Moderate.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Small sample.

    Scientific details →

  • Antibiotic residues in Egyptian chicken

    Noah SM et al.. Sci Rep 2026 · PMID 42527435 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-63227-2
    Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study

    Many chicken samples had antibiotic residues above legal limits, especially in liver, but estimated health risk was low.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Antibiotic residues in chicken tissues and consumer risk

    How was the study done?

    Cross-sectional residue survey (HPLC) with risk assessment

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    180 samples (60 breast, 60 thigh, 60 liver); Chicken tissues from poultry shops

    What was actually found?

    Detected: enrofloxacin 51.67%, oxytetracycline 71.67%, sulfadimidine 16.67%; of positives, 54.84%, 55.81% and 70% exceeded MRLs. Liver had highest levels (e.g., oxytetracycline mean 10,625 ug/kg). EDI 0.012-0.590 ug/kg bw/day; HQ 0.0002-0.050, indicating no significant health risk.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Descriptive; HQ

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Withdrawal periods are not always respected in some Egyptian supply chains.

    What are the study's limitations?

    One city; unclear shop selection; no confirmatory LC-MS/MS; risk estimate uses average levels and intakes only; eggs not studied.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports residue concern in Egypt; not toxicity.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Low (Egypt).

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Cannot generalise nationwide.

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (1)

  • Where dioxins in German eggs and meat come from

    Weber R et al.. Environ Sci Eur 2018 · PMID 30464877 · DOI 10.1186/s12302-018-0166-9
    Narrative reviewcited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked

    In Germany, contaminated soils and old PCB materials are the main sources; outdoor hens can exceed EU limits even at low soil levels.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Which sources cause PCDD/F and PCB contamination of food of animal origin, and how should they be managed?

    How was the study done?

    Narrative review summarising a German Environment Agency project on PCDD/F and PCB sources for food of animal origin

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Not applicable; Food-producing animals (laying hens outdoors, suckler calves, beef)

    What was actually found?

    Outdoor laying hens can exceed EU egg limits at soil PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ below 5 ng/kg dm; soil-chicken-egg pathway is probably the most sensitive route for human exposure; exceedances in free-range chicken, sheep and beef often occur without a known source. Major German sources: contaminated soils, PCBs from buildings, PCBs present at farms.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Not applicable

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Free-range hens on contaminated soil are a particular risk.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Narrative, not systematic; Abstract only

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts the claim that industrial production is the problem.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High for Germany.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Gives no prevalence data for German eggs.

    Scientific details →

Regional context

Germany / EU

Pigeon and quail are minor foods; EU hygiene rules apply to all poultry species.

Egypt

Pigeon (often stuffed, 'حمام محشي') and quail are common traditional foods; pigeon towers and quail farms exist; avian influenza is enzootic in Egyptian poultry (I-CHK-10), which concerns all domestic birds handled alive.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Mostly false The rule allowing pigeon and quail but forbidding other poultry is not based on scientific evidence and is internally inconsistent.

The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:

  • Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
  • Hormonal growth promoters
  • Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
  • Pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, etc.)
  • Animal husbandry and feed
  • Controls, imports, recalls, labelling

Poultry

Choose a country to see the checked information for it.

Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.

Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country

References

  1. Salmonella enterica serotypes isolated from squabs reveal multidrug resistance and a distinct pathogenicity gene repertoire.. Osman KM et al.. Rev Sci Tech 2014 · PMID 25812222 · DOI 10.20506/rst.33.3.2336
  2. Health risk assessment of enrofloxacin, oxytetracycline, and sulfadimidine residues in broiler chicken carcasses marketed in Mit Ghamr, Egypt.. Noah SM et al.. Sci Rep 2026 · PMID 42527435 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-63227-2
  3. Reviewing the relevance of dioxin and PCB sources for food from animal origin and the need for their inventory, control and management.. Weber R et al.. Environ Sci Eur 2018 · PMID 30464877 · DOI 10.1186/s12302-018-0166-9

← Back to overview