Mostly false Certainty of evidence: low provisional C-SRC-29

Cows naturally lactate seasonally (after giving birth), but dairy cows are injected with oxytocin all year round so that they keep producing milk; such milk is 'induced, not real'.

Conclusion: Oxytocin misuse occurs in some regions, but it releases milk rather than creating year-round lactation, and harm to consumers is unproven.

Original statement

في بقره بتحلب طول السنه وما فيش حاجه اسمها كده ده البقر ده مواسم يعني يولد يعني يخلف يرضع يعني ايه بقرب اوكسيتوسين تحقن طول السنه ما الاوكسيتوسين ده هرمون غده درقيه خلفي ما الدرقيه قصدي نخاميه

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

Cows naturally lactate seasonally (after giving birth), but dairy cows are injected with oxytocin all year round so that they keep producing milk; such milk is 'induced, not real'.

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الهرم الغذائي الجديده (Open source)
Published
20 January 2026
Timestamp
0:47:23 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; wording may contain speech-recognition errors; speaker turns are not marked, the excerpt was judged to be Elawady's own speech from context.
Claimed mechanism

Year-round oxytocin injections keep cows lactating outside the natural post-calving period.

Claimed health effect

Implied: milk from such cows is unnatural and harmful (part of the general case against dairy).

Population concerned

Consumers of cow's milk.

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found; stated as a general description of dairy farming

Diverging source versions

انا بقى بحن البقره بيه طول السنه الاكسيتوسين ده فتفضل طول السنه تحلب على ان عندها بيبي كويس كويس فاللبن ده يا باشا اصلا انديوسد مش مش حقيقي

So I inject the cow with this oxytocin all year round, so she keeps giving milk all year as if she had a baby. So this milk is basically induced, not real.

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الهرم الغذائي الجديده (Open source)
Published
20 January 2026
Timestamp
0:47:59 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; wording may contain speech-recognition errors; speaker turns are not marked, the excerpt was judged to be Elawady's own speech from context.

Scientific assessment

Mostly false – Essential parts of the statement are not supported by the evidence or are strongly exaggerated.

Certainty of evidence: low – Further research is likely to change the assessment considerably.

1. What was claimed?

Dairy cows give milk all year only because they are injected with oxytocin; the milk is therefore not 'real'.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

Oxytocin is released from the posterior pituitary (he corrects himself to the pituitary) and contracts the milk-producing tissue during milking and after birth. Repeated oxytocin injection of dairy animals is a documented practice in at least one country: an Indian survey describes indiscriminate use and found oxytocin in market milk from milkmen (mean 8.9 ng/mL; I-INTA-05). Long-term exogenous oxytocin reduces the udder's response to the cow's own oxytocin (I-INTA-06), so the practice is undesirable.

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

Oxytocin does not create or maintain lactation over the year. Its role is milk ejection (let-down): it releases the milk already produced, which is needed for the more than 80% of stored milk in the alveoli (I-INTA-06). Milk production is initiated by pregnancy and calving and maintained by hormones such as growth hormone and prolactin, local mechanisms in the udder and regular milk removal (I-INTA-07). Year-round milk supply in dairy herds is explained by repeated calvings at different times of year, not by oxytocin (general dairy practice; not taken from a cited study).

4. What remains unclear?

How often oxytocin is injected in Egyptian dairy farming is unknown to us; we found no Egyptian survey. Whether oxytocin traces in milk have any effect on consumers is not established: the Indian survey measured no health outcomes (I-INTA-05), and peptide hormones like oxytocin are generally unstable and poorly absorbed in the gut (I-INTA-18, indirect).

5. Which studies support it?

I-INTA-05 (practice documented in India).

6. Which studies contradict it?

I-INTA-06, I-INTA-07 (oxytocin causes milk ejection, not year-round lactation).

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Not verified for this review; in the EU oxytocin is a veterinary medicinal product, and routine use for milk let-down was not documented in the sources read.

8. What is known about Egypt?

No Egypt-specific data found.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Concerns about oxytocin misuse in some dairy systems are legitimate for animal welfare and regulation, but the claim that cows give milk all year only because of oxytocin is physiologically wrong, and a health risk to milk drinkers has not been shown.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

The physiology (oxytocin causes milk ejection, not year-round lactation) is well established in reviews, but data on how often oxytocin is injected in Egyptian dairy farming and on any consumer health effect are lacking.

Source quality

Elawady's own words in an archive machine transcript (live stream); exact wording may contain recognition errors.

Regional transferability

Oxytocin misuse is documented in parts of South Asia (I-INTA-05); prevalence in Egypt and Europe was not verified.

Individual exceptions

Not applicable.

Regional scope of the claim
depends on production conditions
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

Dr. Elawady said that cows only give milk all year because farmers inject them with oxytocin. Oxytocin is a real hormone that helps release milk from the udder, and in India some farmers have been reported to inject it too often. But oxytocin does not make a cow produce milk: that depends on calving and other hormones, and herds give milk all year because cows calve at different times. We found no study showing that traces of oxytocin in milk harm people.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (1)

  • Is there oxytocin in market milk?

    Mishra M et al.. Toxicology mechanisms and methods 2014 · PMID 24712660 · DOI 10.3109/15376516.2014.910851
    Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study

    In 55 milk samples from an Indian city, oxytocin was found in milkman samples; the authors report indiscriminate injection of cattle.

    Practice of oxytocin injection documented in India.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Oxytocin in market milk

    How was the study done?

    Survey with laboratory analysis

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    55 samples, Lucknow

    What was actually found?

    Oxytocin detected, mean 8.9 ng/mL in milkman samples

    How large was the observed effect?

    Range 21 pg/mL-18.9 ng/mL

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    The practice exists in some regions

    What are the study's limitations?

    One city; no health outcomes

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports that injections are used; not that they cause year-round lactation or harm

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Low

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Any health effect in consumers

    Scientific details →

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (2)

  • What does oxytocin do in dairy cows?

    Bruckmaier RM et al.. Journal of animal science 2008 · PMID 17709779 · DOI 10.2527/jas.2007-0335
    Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study

    Oxytocin releases the milk stored in the udder during milking; long-term injections make cows respond less to their own oxytocin.

    Oxytocin triggers milk ejection; it does not create year-round lactation.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Physiology of milk let-down

    How was the study done?

    Narrative review

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Not applicable

    What was actually found?

    Oxytocin is needed to release most stored milk; chronic injections reduce natural responsiveness

    How large was the observed effect?

    Not applicable

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Oxytocin helps milk flow, it does not make a cow produce milk all year

    What are the study's limitations?

    Review; abstract only

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts the mechanism he describes; supports that injections are problematic for the animal

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    How often the practice occurs in Egypt

    Scientific details →

  • Which hormones make cows produce milk?

    Svennersten-Sjaunja K et al.. Domestic animal endocrinology 2005 · PMID 15876512 · DOI 10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.03.006
    Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Pregnancy hormones, growth hormone and prolactin build and run milk production; oxytocin only releases the milk.

    Lactation is driven by pregnancy hormones and milk removal; oxytocin only ejects milk.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Endocrinology of milk production

    How was the study done?

    Narrative review

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Not applicable

    What was actually found?

    Milk synthesis and milk ejection are regulated separately

    How large was the observed effect?

    Not applicable

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Year-round milk supply is not explained by oxytocin

    What are the study's limitations?

    Review

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts the mechanism claimed

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Farm practices in Egypt

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (1)

  • Is oxytocin absorbed when swallowed?

    Taherali F et al.. Pharmaceutics 2023 · PMID 37514143 · DOI 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071956
    Laboratory / cell studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Peptide hormones like oxytocin are broken down in the gut and poorly absorbed; that is why they are usually injected.

    Peptides like oxytocin are generally unstable and poorly absorbed in the gut.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Oxytocin stability in the gut

    How was the study done?

    Laboratory study

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Oxytocin and 11 analogues

    What was actually found?

    Native oxytocin is enzymatically vulnerable

    How large was the observed effect?

    Up to 79% stability gain with modifications

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Oxytocin traces in milk are unlikely to act like an injection

    What are the study's limitations?

    Indirect lab data

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Weakens a consumer-harm argument

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Exact absorption from milk

    Scientific details →

Regional context

Germany / EU

Not verified for this review; in the EU oxytocin is a veterinary medicinal product, and routine use for milk let-down was not documented in the sources read.

Egypt

No Egypt-specific data found.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Mostly false Oxytocin misuse occurs in some regions, but it releases milk rather than creating year-round lactation, and harm to consumers is unproven.

The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:

  • Pesticides and pesticide residues
  • Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
  • Hormonal growth promoters
  • Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
  • Mycotoxins (mould toxins)
  • Controls, imports, recalls, labelling

Eggs · Poultry · Dairy · Fish and seafood · Red meat · Fruit and vegetables

Choose a country to see the checked information for it.

Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.

Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country

References

  1. Analysis of oxytocin in milk samples and intake pattern in different age groups of Indian population.. Mishra M et al.. Toxicology mechanisms and methods 2014 · PMID 24712660 · DOI 10.3109/15376516.2014.910851
  2. Induction of milk ejection and milk removal in different production systems.. Bruckmaier RM et al.. Journal of animal science 2008 · PMID 17709779 · DOI 10.2527/jas.2007-0335
  3. Endocrinology of milk production.. Svennersten-Sjaunja K et al.. Domestic animal endocrinology 2005 · PMID 15876512 · DOI 10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.03.006
  4. Impact of Peptide Structure on Colonic Stability and Tissue Permeability.. Taherali F et al.. Pharmaceutics 2023 · PMID 37514143 · DOI 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071956

← Back to overview