Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study A-ABX-01 in-depth review

Antibiotics in infancy and childhood obesity

Association of antibiotics in infancy with early childhood obesity.

Overview

Bailey LC et al.. JAMA Pediatr 2014 · PMID 25265089 · DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1539

Children with 4+ antibiotic courses before age 2 were about 11% more likely to be obese.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Link antibiotics to obesity.

How was the study done?

Health-record cohort.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

64,580 children.

What was actually found?

Small increased risk with broad-spectrum.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 1.11-1.16.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Small effect, may not be causal.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports association.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Bailey LC, Forrest CB, Zhang P, Richards TM, Livshits A, DeRusso PA
Journal
JAMA Pediatr
Year
2014
Identifier
PMID 25265089 DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1539
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract/record

2. Research question

Do antibiotics at 0-23 months affect obesity at 24-59 months?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Retrospective EHR cohort, Cox models
Population

Children in CHOP primary-care network

Country

USA (Philadelphia region)

Period

2001-2013

Sample size

64,580

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Annual visits 0-23 months and >=1 visit at 24-59 months

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Antibiotic episodes (number, spectrum, timing)

Comparator

Fewer/no episodes

Endpoints

Obesity (NHANES BMI norms)

Statistical methods

Cox PH, adjusted for demographic, practice, clinical covariates

5. Actual results

Results

69% exposed; >=4 episodes RR 1.11 (1.02-1.21); broad-spectrum RR 1.16 (1.06-1.29); broad-spectrum at 0-5 months RR 1.11 (1.03-1.19), 6-11 months RR 1.09 (1.04-1.14); narrow-spectrum not associated.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Repeated broad-spectrum exposure is associated with early childhood obesity; narrowing selection is potentially a modifiable risk factor.

6. Strengths

  • Large
  • Measured anthropometry
  • Spectrum-specific analysis (narrow-spectrum null acts as partial negative control)

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational; residual confounding
  • Infections may confound

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Confounding by indication possible; narrow-spectrum null result reduces but does not exclude it.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Small relative effect (11-16%); absolute risk not reported in abstract.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-ABX-05.

11. Independent contrary findings

I-ABX-04 (very low certainty).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Moderate.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Good cohort; association.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)essentially correct but incomplete

14. Open questions

Causality.

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

In 64,580 children, >=4 courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics before age two raised early-childhood obesity risk by 11-16%.

A. What was actually studied?

Antibiotics and obesity.

B. What did the authors find?

RR 1.11 (>=4 episodes), 1.16 broad-spectrum.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Associated; narrowing spectrum potentially modifiable.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

'Raised risk' (causal wording).

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Numbers correct; causal phrasing ('raised') overstates an association. Note: RR 1.11 is for >=4 episodes of any antibiotic; 1.16 is the broad-spectrum estimate.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
essentially correct but incomplete