Cross-sectional studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-CHK-03 standard review
ESBL genes in Dutch chicken meat and people
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes of Escherichia coli in chicken meat and humans, The Netherlands.
Overview
Overdevest I et al.. Emerg Infect Dis 2011 · PMID 21762575 · DOI 10.3201/eid1707.110209
Four in five chicken samples had ESBL genes, matching those found in people.
Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
What are prevalence and characteristics of ESBL genes in retail chicken and humans in the Netherlands?
- How was the study done?
Cross-sectional study of ESBL genes in retail chicken and human rectal/blood isolates
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
Not stated in abstract; Retail chicken; patients in 4 hospitals
- What was actually found?
ESBL genes in 79.8% of chicken meat; predominant genes identical in meat and human rectal swabs; frequently in blood isolates; high similarity of E. coli strains.
- How large was the observed effect?
Descriptive
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Resistant bacteria on raw chicken are common in some countries.
- What are the study's limitations?
Directionality inferred; Sample sizes not in abstract
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports the claim.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot prove transmission direction.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Overdevest I, Willemsen I, Rijnsburger M, Eustace A, Xu L, Hawkey P, Heck M, Savelkoul P, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, van der Zwaluw K, Huijsdens X, Kluytmans J
- Journal
- Emerg Infect Dis
- Year
- 2011
- Identifier
- PMID 21762575 DOI 10.3201/eid1707.110209 · PMC3381403
- Verification
- verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
No COI statement in record
2. Research question
What are prevalence and characteristics of ESBL genes in retail chicken and humans in the Netherlands?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cross-sectional study – Cross-sectional study of ESBL genes in retail chicken and human rectal/blood isolates
- Population
Retail chicken; patients in 4 hospitals
- Country
Netherlands
- Period
Not stated in abstract (published 2011)
- Sample size
Not stated in abstract
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Raw meat samples; fecal carriage surveys
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
ESBL genes
- Comparator
Between sources
- Endpoints
Prevalence and genetic similarity
- Statistical methods
Descriptive
5. Actual results
- Results
ESBL genes in 79.8% of chicken meat; predominant genes identical in meat and human rectal swabs; frequently in blood isolates; high similarity of E. coli strains.
- Absolute risks
not applicable
- Authors' conclusion
Abundant ESBL genes in the food chain may affect treatment options.
6. Strengths
- Simultaneous sampling
7. Weaknesses
- Directionality inferred
- Sample sizes not in abstract
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- none applicable
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Cross-sectional.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Descriptive.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
11. Independent contrary findings
Same as A-CHK-02.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
High.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Supports overlap.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | low |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Attribution.
15. Linked fact checks
Use by the Tayebat archive
Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.
- What the archive says about the study
Listed in bibliography (no interpretation).
- A. What was actually studied?
ESBL in chicken and humans.
- B. What did the authors find?
79.8% chicken positive; similar genes.
- C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?
Possible impact on treatment.
- D. What does the archive derive from it?
Supports transmission narrative.
- E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?
Justified as supporting evidence of overlap.
- Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
- not applicable