Cross-sectional studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-CHK-03 standard review

ESBL genes in Dutch chicken meat and people

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes of Escherichia coli in chicken meat and humans, The Netherlands.

Overview

Overdevest I et al.. Emerg Infect Dis 2011 · PMID 21762575 · DOI 10.3201/eid1707.110209

Four in five chicken samples had ESBL genes, matching those found in people.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

What are prevalence and characteristics of ESBL genes in retail chicken and humans in the Netherlands?

How was the study done?

Cross-sectional study of ESBL genes in retail chicken and human rectal/blood isolates

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Not stated in abstract; Retail chicken; patients in 4 hospitals

What was actually found?

ESBL genes in 79.8% of chicken meat; predominant genes identical in meat and human rectal swabs; frequently in blood isolates; high similarity of E. coli strains.

How large was the observed effect?

Descriptive

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Resistant bacteria on raw chicken are common in some countries.

What are the study's limitations?

Directionality inferred; Sample sizes not in abstract

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot prove transmission direction.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Overdevest I, Willemsen I, Rijnsburger M, Eustace A, Xu L, Hawkey P, Heck M, Savelkoul P, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, van der Zwaluw K, Huijsdens X, Kluytmans J
Journal
Emerg Infect Dis
Year
2011
Identifier
PMID 21762575 DOI 10.3201/eid1707.110209 · PMC3381403
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No COI statement in record

2. Research question

What are prevalence and characteristics of ESBL genes in retail chicken and humans in the Netherlands?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cross-sectional study – Cross-sectional study of ESBL genes in retail chicken and human rectal/blood isolates
Population

Retail chicken; patients in 4 hospitals

Country

Netherlands

Period

Not stated in abstract (published 2011)

Sample size

Not stated in abstract

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Raw meat samples; fecal carriage surveys

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

ESBL genes

Comparator

Between sources

Endpoints

Prevalence and genetic similarity

Statistical methods

Descriptive

5. Actual results

Results

ESBL genes in 79.8% of chicken meat; predominant genes identical in meat and human rectal swabs; frequently in blood isolates; high similarity of E. coli strains.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Abundant ESBL genes in the food chain may affect treatment options.

6. Strengths

  • Simultaneous sampling

7. Weaknesses

  • Directionality inferred
  • Sample sizes not in abstract

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Cross-sectional.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Descriptive.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-CHK-05.

11. Independent contrary findings

Same as A-CHK-02.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports overlap.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Attribution.

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in bibliography (no interpretation).

A. What was actually studied?

ESBL in chicken and humans.

B. What did the authors find?

79.8% chicken positive; similar genes.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Possible impact on treatment.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Supports transmission narrative.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Justified as supporting evidence of overlap.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
not applicable