Meta-analysiscited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-INS-17 standard review

Weight gain with insulin

Increase of body weight during the first year of intensive insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview

Pontiroli AE et al.. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011 · PMID 21645195 · DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01433.x

The more intensive the insulin treatment, the more weight people gain in the first year.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Weight increase in first year of insulin treatment and predictors

How was the study done?

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 RCTs

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

46 RCTs; Type 2 diabetes starting/intensifying insulin

What was actually found?

Weight gain related to intensity and regimen.

How large was the observed effect?

not reported in abstract

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Weight gain is a real insulin side effect.

What are the study's limitations?

Effect sizes not in abstract; Heterogeneous trials

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports weight-gain kernel of C-INS-01.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

International.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

That insulin causes obesity in general.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Pontiroli AE, Miele L, Morabito A
Journal
Diabetes Obes Metab
Year
2011
Identifier
PMID 21645195 DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01433.x
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Weight increase in first year of insulin treatment and predictors

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 RCTs
Population

Type 2 diabetes starting/intensifying insulin

Country

International

Period

Published RCTs (dates not given)

Sample size

46 RCTs

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

As described in the abstract; details not available in abstract.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Insulin regimens/analogues

Comparator

Other regimens

Endpoints

Body weight change

Statistical methods

Weighted regression; meta-analysis

5. Actual results

Results

Weight gain associated with treatment intensity (target FBG, dose, final HbA1c, hypoglycaemia). Less with basal than twice-daily or prandial; less with detemir than NPH; glargine vs NPH no difference.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Weight increase during the first year of insulin is associated with treatment intensity and depends on regimen.

6. Strengths

  • PRISMA
  • Many RCTs

7. Weaknesses

  • Effect sizes not in abstract
  • Heterogeneous trials

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Quality appraisal details not in abstract.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Qualitative conclusions only in abstract.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports weight-gain kernel of C-INS-01.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

International.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Reliable on weight gain.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)correctly reported

14. Open questions

None beyond those stated.

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in the archive bibliography for 'insulin-injections' without its own interpretation; used as general support for the claim that insulin intensification harms.

A. What was actually studied?

Weight increase in first year of insulin treatment and predictors

B. What did the authors find?

Weight gain related to intensity and regimen.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Weight increase during the first year of insulin is associated with treatment intensity and depends on regimen.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Supports insulin-induced weight gain.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Justified.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
correctly reported