Meta-analysiscited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-INS-17 standard review
Weight gain with insulin
Increase of body weight during the first year of intensive insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Overview
Pontiroli AE et al.. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011 · PMID 21645195 · DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01433.x
The more intensive the insulin treatment, the more weight people gain in the first year.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Weight increase in first year of insulin treatment and predictors
- How was the study done?
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 RCTs
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
46 RCTs; Type 2 diabetes starting/intensifying insulin
- What was actually found?
Weight gain related to intensity and regimen.
- How large was the observed effect?
not reported in abstract
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Weight gain is a real insulin side effect.
- What are the study's limitations?
Effect sizes not in abstract; Heterogeneous trials
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports weight-gain kernel of C-INS-01.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
International.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
That insulin causes obesity in general.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Pontiroli AE, Miele L, Morabito A
- Journal
- Diabetes Obes Metab
- Year
- 2011
- Identifier
- PMID 21645195 DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01433.x
- Verification
- verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
not stated in abstract
2. Research question
Weight increase in first year of insulin treatment and predictors
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 RCTs
- Population
Type 2 diabetes starting/intensifying insulin
- Country
International
- Period
Published RCTs (dates not given)
- Sample size
46 RCTs
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
As described in the abstract; details not available in abstract.
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Insulin regimens/analogues
- Comparator
Other regimens
- Endpoints
Body weight change
- Statistical methods
Weighted regression; meta-analysis
5. Actual results
- Results
Weight gain associated with treatment intensity (target FBG, dose, final HbA1c, hypoglycaemia). Less with basal than twice-daily or prandial; less with detemir than NPH; glargine vs NPH no difference.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
Weight increase during the first year of insulin is associated with treatment intensity and depends on regimen.
6. Strengths
- PRISMA
- Many RCTs
7. Weaknesses
- Effect sizes not in abstract
- Heterogeneous trials
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- AMSTAR 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Quality appraisal details not in abstract.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Qualitative conclusions only in abstract.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Supports weight-gain kernel of C-INS-01.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
International.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Reliable on weight gain.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | not applicable |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | correctly reported |
14. Open questions
None beyond those stated.
15. Linked fact checks
Use by the Tayebat archive
Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.
- What the archive says about the study
Listed in the archive bibliography for 'insulin-injections' without its own interpretation; used as general support for the claim that insulin intensification harms.
- A. What was actually studied?
Weight increase in first year of insulin treatment and predictors
- B. What did the authors find?
Weight gain related to intensity and regimen.
- C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?
Weight increase during the first year of insulin is associated with treatment intensity and depends on regimen.
- D. What does the archive derive from it?
Supports insulin-induced weight gain.
- E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?
Justified.
- Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
- correctly reported