Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study A-ORG-06 in-depth review

Gallbladder removal and bowel cancer

Intestinal cancer after cholecystectomy: is bile involved in carcinogenesis?

Overview

Lagergren J et al.. Gastroenterology 2001 · PMID 11522737 · DOI 10.1053/gast.2001.27083

After gallbladder removal, rare small-bowel cancers were about 1.8 times as frequent and right-sided colon cancer 1.16 times as frequent as in the population.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Cancer risk

How was the study done?

Register

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

278,460

What was actually found?

Higher proximal bowel cancer

How large was the observed effect?

SIR 1.77/1.16

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Small extra risk of rare cancers

What are the study's limitations?

No confounder control

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

European

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation; absolute size

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Lagergren J, Ye W, Ekbom A
Journal
Gastroenterology
Year
2001
Identifier
PMID 11522737 DOI 10.1053/gast.2001.27083
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

COI: not stated in record | Grants: none listed

2. Research question

Bowel cancer after cholecystectomy

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Register cohort with SIR vs population
Population

Swedish cholecystectomized patients

Country

Sweden

Period

1965-1997

Sample size

278,460 (3,519,682 person-years)

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Cholecystectomy

Comparator

General population (SIR)

Endpoints

Intestinal cancer by site

5. Actual results

Results

Small bowel adenocarcinoma SIR 1.77 (1.37-2.24); small bowel carcinoids SIR 1.71 (1.39-2.08); right colon cancer SIR 1.16 (1.08-1.24); no association distally; persisted up to 33 years.

Absolute risks

Not reported; small bowel adenocarcinoma is rare, so absolute excess is small

Authors' conclusion

Cholecystectomy increases intestinal cancer risk declining with distance from the bile duct; bile exposure may be the mechanism.

6. Strengths

  • Very large, long follow-up
  • Dose-like gradient

7. Weaknesses

  • Comparison with general population; gallstone disease itself and lifestyle not controlled
  • No confounder adjustment

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
high
Rationale

Confounding by gallstone disease/diet/obesity cannot be excluded with SIR design.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports C-ORG-06.

11. Independent contrary findings

Later meta-analyses mixed; one PLoS One meta-analysis on cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer carries an Expression of Concern (PMID 38457406, seen during search, not assessed).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

European.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Association plausible; causal and absolute importance uncertain.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biashigh
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)essentially correct but incomplete

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

278,460 cholecystectomy patients followed up to 33 years showed elevated small-bowel adenocarcinoma (SIR 1.77) and right colon cancer (SIR 1.16), gradient with distance from bile duct; AR: changes in bile flow drive carcinogenesis.

A. What was actually studied?

Cancer after cholecystectomy

B. What did the authors find?

SIR 1.77 small bowel; 1.16 right colon

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Cholecystectomy increases risk; bile may be mechanism

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Used to show a long-term cancer price of gallbladder removal.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Numbers correct and match the authors' causal wording. Missing: absolute risks are small (rare cancers), and the comparison is with the general population, so gallstone disease itself may contribute.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
essentially correct but incomplete