Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-PPI-02 standard review

PPIs and kidney decline without acute kidney injury

Long-term kidney outcomes among users of proton pump inhibitors without intervening acute kidney injury.

Overview

Xie Y et al.. Kidney Int 2017 · PMID 28237709 · DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2016.12.021

Compared with H2-blocker users, PPI users had 19–30% higher rates of kidney decline.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Kidney outcomes without prior AKI.

How was the study done?

Veterans cohort, 5 years.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

144,032 new users.

What was actually found?

Modestly higher risk of CKD outcomes with PPIs.

How large was the observed effect?

HR 1.19–1.30.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Possible small kidney risk.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational; veterans.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Association transferable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Xie Y, Bowe B, Li T, Xian H, Yan Y, Al-Aly Z
Journal
Kidney Int
Year
2017
Identifier
PMID 28237709 DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2016.12.021
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Is PPI use associated with chronic renal outcomes without intervening AKI?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Retrospective cohort, US Veterans Affairs databases, new users, censoring at AKI
Population

Incident users of acid suppression

Country

USA

Period

5-year follow-up

Sample size

144,032 (125,596 PPI; 18,436 H2RA)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

see abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Incident PPI use

Comparator

Incident H2RA use

Endpoints

eGFR <60, incident CKD, eGFR decline >30%, ESRD or eGFR decline >50%

Statistical methods

Survival models censored at AKI

5. Actual results

Results

vs H2RA: eGFR <60 HR 1.19 (1.15–1.24); incident CKD 1.26 (1.20–1.33); eGFR decline >30% 1.22 (1.16–1.28); ESRD/>50% decline 1.30 (1.15–1.48); proportion mediated by AKI 44.7–46.72% across the four outcomes.

Absolute risks

not reported in abstract

Authors' conclusion

PPI use is associated with increased risk of chronic renal outcomes in the absence of intervening AKI.

6. Strengths

  • Large new-user active-comparator design
  • Several renal outcomes

7. Weaknesses

  • Mostly older male veterans
  • Residual confounding
  • Administrative data

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Confounding by indication; channeling of sicker patients to PPIs possible.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Modest relative risks from observational data; see bias notes.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-PPI-01 (CKD).

11. Independent contrary findings

COMPASS (I-PPI-01); Brown 2021 (I-PPI-02) on residual confounding in similar designs.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High: European (Swedish, UK, Dutch, German) data show similar associations; PPIs are widely used in Germany.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Consistent observational association of modest size.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)essentially correct but incomplete

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in the archive bibliography of the acid-blockers rule without its own interpretation; used implicitly to support the rule summary ('long-term suppression turns against the body: CKD, bacterial overgrowth, C. difficile, pneumonia, B12 and magnesium deficiency, hip fractures, microbiome change, excess mortality').

A. What was actually studied?

Is PPI use associated with chronic renal outcomes without intervening AKI?

B. What did the authors find?

vs H2RA: eGFR <60 HR 1.19 (1.15–1.24); incident CKD 1.26 (1.20–1.33); eGFR decline >30% 1.22 (1.16–1.28); ESRD/>50% decline 1.30 (1.15–1.48); proportion mediated by AKI 44.7–46.72% across the four outcomes.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

PPI use is associated with increased risk of chronic renal outcomes in the absence of intervening AKI.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Supports the CKD part of the summary.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

As an association yes; causality not established.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
essentially correct but incomplete