Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-PPI-03 standard review

PPIs and CKD progression in Stockholm

Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risk of Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Overview

Klatte DCF et al.. Gastroenterology 2017 · PMID 28583827 · DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.046

PPI starters had about 26% higher risk of kidney function decline than H2-blocker starters.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

CKD progression with PPIs.

How was the study done?

Swedish regional database.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

About 115,000 new users.

What was actually found?

Modestly higher progression risk.

How large was the observed effect?

HR 1.26.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Possible small risk.

What are the study's limitations?

Residual confounding acknowledged.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Directly European.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Klatte DCF, Gasparini A, Xu H, de Deco P, Trevisan M, Johansson ALV, Wettermark B, Ärnlöv J, Janmaat CJ, Lindholm B, Dekker FW, Coresh J, Grams ME, Carrero JJ
Journal
Gastroenterology
Year
2017
Identifier
PMID 28583827 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.046
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Is PPI use associated with CKD progression?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Retrospective new-user cohort, Stockholm creatinine measurements database
Population

New users of PPIs and H2 blockers in Stockholm

Country

Sweden

Period

2007–2010; median 2.7 years

Sample size

105,305 PPI; 9,578 H2B

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

see abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

New PPI use; cumulative exposure

Comparator

New H2-blocker use

Endpoints

Doubling of creatinine or eGFR decline ≥30%; ESRD; AKI

Statistical methods

Adjusted Cox models; cumulative exposure

5. Actual results

Results

Doubling of creatinine HR 1.26 (1.05–1.51); eGFR decline ≥30% HR 1.26 (1.16–1.36); ESRD HR 2.40 (0.76–7.58, n.s.); AKI HR 1.30 (1.00–1.69); graded association with cumulative PPI exposure, not with H2B.

Absolute risks

not reported in abstract

Authors' conclusion

Initiation and cumulative PPI exposure are associated with CKD progression; association modest and cannot exclude residual confounding.

6. Strengths

  • Complete pharmacy dispensing data
  • Laboratory-based outcomes
  • European setting

7. Weaknesses

  • Short follow-up
  • Authors acknowledge residual confounding

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Authors explicitly cannot exclude residual confounding.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Modest relative risks from observational data; see bias notes.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-PPI-01.

11. Independent contrary findings

COMPASS (I-PPI-01).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High: European (Swedish, UK, Dutch, German) data show similar associations; PPIs are widely used in Germany.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Good-quality European cohort; modest association.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)essentially correct but incomplete

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in the archive bibliography of the acid-blockers rule without its own interpretation; used implicitly to support the rule summary ('long-term suppression turns against the body: CKD, bacterial overgrowth, C. difficile, pneumonia, B12 and magnesium deficiency, hip fractures, microbiome change, excess mortality').

A. What was actually studied?

Is PPI use associated with CKD progression?

B. What did the authors find?

Doubling of creatinine HR 1.26 (1.05–1.51); eGFR decline ≥30% HR 1.26 (1.16–1.36); ESRD HR 2.40 (0.76–7.58, n.s.); AKI HR 1.30 (1.00–1.69); graded association with cumulative PPI exposure, not with H2B.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Initiation and cumulative PPI exposure are associated with CKD progression; association modest and cannot exclude residual confounding.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Supports the CKD claim.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

As association; authors themselves stress modest size and residual confounding.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
essentially correct but incomplete