Case series / case reportcited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study A-VEG-06 in-depth review

Kidney damage from green juicing

Oxalate nephropathy due to 'juicing': case report and review.

Overview

Getting JE et al.. Am J Med 2013 · PMID 23830537 · DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.019

Rare kidney failure from heavy oxalate-rich juicing, mainly in people with kidney disease.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Describe juicing nephropathy

How was the study done?

Case report + series

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

65 reviewed patients plus index case report

What was actually found?

Diet cause in 3 with CKD

How large was the observed effect?

Not applicable

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Kidney patients should avoid juice cleanses.

What are the study's limitations?

Case data

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports niche risk

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show risk of normal vegetable intake.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Getting JE, Gregoire JR, Phul A, Kasten MJ
Journal
Am J Med
Year
2013
Identifier
PMID 23830537 DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.019
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Describe juicing-related oxalate nephropathy and causes of renal oxalosis.

3. Study design and population

Study design
Case series / case report – Case report and retrospective case series
Population

Index patient + 65 Mayo Clinic patients with biopsy-proven renal CaOx crystals

Country

USA

Period

1985-2010

Sample size

65 reviewed Mayo Clinic patients (1985-2010) plus case report; abstract does not state whether the index patient is counted among the 65

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Biopsy-proven renal oxalosis with renal failure

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Oxalate-rich juices; other causes

Comparator

None

Endpoints

Causes of oxalosis

Statistical methods

Descriptive

5. Actual results

Results

Cause identified in all 65: single cause in 36, ≥2 causes in 29; 3 patients incl. index had presumed diet-induced oxalate nephropathy in the context of CKD.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Oxalate-rich diet may precipitate acute renal failure in CKD; juicing appears to be a potential cause.

6. Strengths

  • Biopsy-proven

7. Weaknesses

  • Case series; selection

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Case data.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Not applicable.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports C-VEG-06.

11. Independent contrary findings

Taylor 2007 for normal intake.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Correct for niche risk.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)essentially correct but incomplete

14. Open questions

Frequency.

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Heavy juicing (~1,500 mg oxalate/day) caused oxalate nephropathy; oxalate-rich diet can precipitate failure in CKD.

A. What was actually studied?

Case + series.

B. What did the authors find?

Diet-induced cases rare (3/65), in CKD.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Awareness in CKD.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Greens harm kidneys.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Correct for extreme juicing in CKD; not for normal intake. 1,500 mg figure not in abstract.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
essentially correct but incomplete