Case series / case reportcited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study A-VEG-06 in-depth review
Kidney damage from green juicing
Oxalate nephropathy due to 'juicing': case report and review.
Overview
Getting JE et al.. Am J Med 2013 · PMID 23830537 · DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.019
Rare kidney failure from heavy oxalate-rich juicing, mainly in people with kidney disease.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Describe juicing nephropathy
- How was the study done?
Case report + series
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
65 reviewed patients plus index case report
- What was actually found?
Diet cause in 3 with CKD
- How large was the observed effect?
Not applicable
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Kidney patients should avoid juice cleanses.
- What are the study's limitations?
Case data
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports niche risk
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot show risk of normal vegetable intake.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Getting JE, Gregoire JR, Phul A, Kasten MJ
- Journal
- Am J Med
- Year
- 2013
- Identifier
- PMID 23830537 DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.019
- Verification
- verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
not stated in abstract
2. Research question
Describe juicing-related oxalate nephropathy and causes of renal oxalosis.
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Case series / case report – Case report and retrospective case series
- Population
Index patient + 65 Mayo Clinic patients with biopsy-proven renal CaOx crystals
- Country
USA
- Period
1985-2010
- Sample size
65 reviewed Mayo Clinic patients (1985-2010) plus case report; abstract does not state whether the index patient is counted among the 65
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Biopsy-proven renal oxalosis with renal failure
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Oxalate-rich juices; other causes
- Comparator
None
- Endpoints
Causes of oxalosis
- Statistical methods
Descriptive
5. Actual results
- Results
Cause identified in all 65: single cause in 36, ≥2 causes in 29; 3 patients incl. index had presumed diet-induced oxalate nephropathy in the context of CKD.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
Oxalate-rich diet may precipitate acute renal failure in CKD; juicing appears to be a potential cause.
6. Strengths
- Biopsy-proven
7. Weaknesses
- Case series; selection
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- none applicable
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Case data.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Not applicable.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Supports C-VEG-06.
11. Independent contrary findings
Taylor 2007 for normal intake.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
High.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Correct for niche risk.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | low |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | not applicable |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | essentially correct but incomplete |
14. Open questions
Frequency.
15. Linked fact checks
Use by the Tayebat archive
Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.
- What the archive says about the study
Heavy juicing (~1,500 mg oxalate/day) caused oxalate nephropathy; oxalate-rich diet can precipitate failure in CKD.
- A. What was actually studied?
Case + series.
- B. What did the authors find?
Diet-induced cases rare (3/65), in CKD.
- C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?
Awareness in CKD.
- D. What does the archive derive from it?
Greens harm kidneys.
- E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?
Correct for extreme juicing in CKD; not for normal intake. 1,500 mg figure not in abstract.
- Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
- essentially correct but incomplete