Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-WHT-08 standard review

Glycaemic load and heart disease in Italy

Dietary glycemic load and index and risk of coronary heart disease in a large italian cohort: the EPICOR study.

Overview

Sieri S et al.. Arch Intern Med 2010 · PMID 20386010 · DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.15

High GL linked to CHD in women, not men.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

GI/GL and CHD

How was the study done?

Cohort

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

47,749 Italians

What was actually found?

Women only association

How large was the observed effect?

RR 2.24 (women)

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Unclear for men

What are the study's limitations?

Few cases

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Not wheat-specific

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Sieri S, Krogh V, Berrino F, Evangelista A, Agnoli C, Brighenti F, Pellegrini N, Palli D, Masala G, Sacerdote C, Veglia F, Tumino R, Frasca G, Grioni S, Pala V, Mattiello A, Chiodini P, Panico S
Journal
Arch Intern Med
Year
2010
Identifier
PMID 20386010 DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.15
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

None stated.

2. Research question

GI/GL and CHD

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort (EPIC Italy)
Population

15,171 men, 32,578 women

Country

Italy

Period

median 7.9 y

Sample size

47,749; 463 CHD cases

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Carbohydrate, GI, GL

Comparator

Lowest quartile

Endpoints

CHD

Statistical methods

Cox

5. Actual results

Results

Women: highest carbohydrate quartile RR 2.00 (1.16-3.43); high-GI carbohydrate RR 1.68 (1.02-2.75); highest GL quartile RR 2.24 (1.26-3.98). No association in men (P interaction 0.04/0.03).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

High GL and high-GI carbohydrate increase CHD risk in women but not men.

6. Strengths

  • European cohort

7. Weaknesses

  • Few cases in women (158)
  • Sex-specific findings

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Wide CIs.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Indirect for C-WHT-05/C-WHT-03.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High (Italy).

13. Overall methodological judgement

Mixed, sex-specific.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in bibliography only.

A. What was actually studied?

GI/GL and CHD.

B. What did the authors find?

Association in women only.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

As stated.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Implicitly against refined carbs.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Indirect; no effect in men; not wheat-specific.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
not applicable