Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-WHT-15 standard review

GI, fibre and diabetes in young women

Glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women.

Overview

Schulze MB et al.. Am J Clin Nutr 2004 · PMID 15277155 · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/80.2.348

High GI linked to 59% higher risk; cereal fibre to 36% lower risk.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

GI/fibre and diabetes

How was the study done?

Cohort

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

91,249

What was actually found?

GI up, fibre down

How large was the observed effect?

RR 1.59/0.64

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Carb quality matters

What are the study's limitations?

Observational

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Indirect

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cause

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Schulze MB, Liu S, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB
Journal
Am J Clin Nutr
Year
2004
Identifier
PMID 15277155 DOI 10.1093/ajcn/80.2.348
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

None stated; NCI grant.

2. Research question

GI, GL, fibre and T2D

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort (NHS II)
Population

91,249 women

Country

USA

Period

8 y

Sample size

91,249; 741 cases

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

GI, GL, cereal fibre

Comparator

Q1

Endpoints

T2D

Statistical methods

Multivariable RR

5. Actual results

Results

GI Q5 RR 1.59 (1.21-2.10); cereal fibre Q5 RR 0.64 (0.48-0.86); GL Q5 RR 1.33 (0.92-1.91; not significant).

Absolute risks

741 cases in 716,300 person-years

Authors' conclusion

Diet high in rapidly absorbed carbohydrates and low in cereal fibre associated with T2D.

6. Strengths

  • Large

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational; GL null

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports C-WHT-05.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Moderate.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in bibliography only.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Indirect support; GL not significant.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
not applicable