Cohort studyindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study I-ABX-114 in-depth review

Danish siblings: early antibiotics not linked to overweight, weakly to asthma

Use of antibiotics in early life and development of diseases in childhood: nationwide registry study.

Overview

Brandt S et al.. BMJ Med 2025 · PMID 40519361 · DOI 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001064

Comparing siblings, the link with overweight vanished and the link with asthma halved.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test links between baby antibiotics and later diseases

How was the study done?

National registers with sibling comparison

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

518,483 children

What was actually found?

Most links weakened within families; asthma and eczema remained

How large was the observed effect?

Overweight sibling HR 1.02; asthma sibling HR 1.24

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Family factors explain much of the earlier findings

What are the study's limitations?

Overweight only from hospital records

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts antibiotics causing obesity; partly supports an asthma link

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causality for asthma

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Brandt S et al.
Journal
BMJ Med
Year
2025
Identifier
PMID 40519361 DOI 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001064
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
full text
Conflicts of interest and funding

COPSAC, EU Horizon 2020, Danish Council for Independent Research, NIH and foundations; one author speaking fee from AstraZeneca (full text).

2. Research question

Is antibiotic use in the first year of life associated with immune-mediated diseases and overweight, and does it persist within sibships?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Nationwide registry cohort with sibling-matched analysis
Population

Children born in Denmark 1998-2006 resident in their first year

Country

Denmark

Period

1998-2016; mean follow-up 13.2 years

Sample size

518,483 children; sibling population 272,753 (126,632 sibships)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

No outcome before age 1

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Any systemic antibiotic before age 1 (40.3%)

Comparator

No antibiotics; siblings

Endpoints

Asthma, allergy, eczema, coeliac disease, juvenile arthritis, type 1 diabetes, overweight

Statistical methods

Mixed-effects Cox; stratified sibling Cox

5. Actual results

Results

Total population: adjusted HRs 1.20-1.53 for several outcomes, dose-response. Table 3 (full text): overweight (hospital diagnosis) adjusted HR 1.34 (1.25-1.43), sibling HR 1.02 (0.86-1.22); asthma ever (hospital) adjusted 1.52 (1.48-1.57), sibling 1.24 (1.16-1.34); asthma (drug-treatment definition) adjusted 1.53 (1.50-1.56), sibling 1.25 (1.20-1.31); asthma onset >5 years (hospital) sibling 1.04 (0.93-1.16); eczema (hospital) sibling 1.35 (1.07-1.69); allergic rhinitis sibling 0.91 (0.69-1.22); drug-defined allergy sibling 1.04 (0.99-1.09).

Absolute risks

Rates per 1000 person-years reported (e.g. overweight hospital diagnosis 0.56); absolute risk differences not reported

Authors' conclusion

Early-life antibiotics were linked with immune-mediated diseases, but familial factors may partly explain this; except for asthma and eczema, antibiotics might not be an independent risk factor, including for overweight.

6. Strengths

  • Nationwide registry, prescription data
  • Sibling design
  • Long follow-up
  • Full text read

7. Weaknesses

  • Overweight captured only by hospital diagnosis (underestimated)
  • Sibling design does not control confounding by indication within families
  • Denmark has low antibiotic use

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Sibling comparison reduces familial confounding; non-shared confounding (infections) remains.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

About 93% of the log-excess risk for overweight and about half for asthma disappears within sibships (recalculated).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Key family-based test for both obesity (C-ABX-05) and asthma/allergy (C-ABX-06).

11. Independent contrary findings

Persistence of asthma/eczema associations within siblings may still reflect respiratory infections (indication).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High (Danish).

13. Overall methodological judgement

Strong evidence that the overweight association is largely familial confounding; asthma association partly persists.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Whether residual asthma association is causal.

15. Linked fact checks