Cohort studyindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study I-BAR-118 in-depth review
US study: cancer after weight-loss surgery
Association of Bariatric Surgery With Cancer Risk and Mortality in Adults With Obesity.
Overview
Aminian et al.. JAMA 2022 · PMID 35657620 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2022.9009
Over 10 years, obesity-related cancer occurred in 2.9% after surgery vs 4.9% without; cancer deaths 0.8% vs 1.4%.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Cancer risk after surgery
- How was the study done?
Matched cohort
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
30,318
- What was actually found?
Fewer cancers and cancer deaths
- How large was the observed effect?
aHR 0.68 and 0.52
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Surgery was linked to less cancer, not more
- What are the study's limitations?
Observational, single system
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts the claim
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Plausible
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Sleeve-only long-term effect
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Aminian et al.
- Journal
- JAMA
- Year
- 2022
- Identifier
- PMID 35657620 DOI 10.1001/jama.2022.9009
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref API
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- full text
- Conflicts of interest and funding
Several authors report industry fees/grants (e.g. Medtronic, Ethicon, Novo Nordisk) per full text; no separate funding statement located.
2. Research question
Is bariatric surgery associated with lower cancer incidence and cancer mortality in adults with obesity?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cohort study – Matched cohort (SPLENDID) with doubly robust estimation, 1:5 matching
- Population
Adults BMI >=35 at a US health system (Cleveland Clinic), 2004-2017
- Country
USA
- Period
2004-Feb 2021
- Sample size
30,318 (5,053 surgery: RYGB 66%, SG 34%; 25,265 controls)
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Excluded prior cancer, alcohol use disorder, transplant, HIV and others
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
RYGB or SG
- Comparator
Matched nonsurgical patients
- Endpoints
13 obesity-associated cancers (incl. oesophageal adenocarcinoma); all cancer; cancer mortality
- Statistical methods
Propensity matching plus multivariable Cox (doubly robust); E-values
5. Actual results
- Results
Obesity-associated cancer 3.0 vs 4.6/1000 person-years; 10-y cumulative 2.9% vs 4.9% (ARD 2.0%); aHR 0.68 (0.53-0.87). Cancer mortality 0.6 vs 1.2/1000 PY; 10-y 0.8% vs 1.4% (ARD 0.6%); aHR 0.52 (0.31-0.88). Weight difference at 10 y 19.2%.
- Absolute risks
10-y obesity-associated cancer 2.9% vs 4.9%; cancer death 0.8% vs 1.4%.
- Authors' conclusion
Bariatric surgery was associated with significantly lower incidence of obesity-associated cancer and cancer-related mortality.
6. Strengths
- Doubly robust analysis, E-values
- One third sleeve
- Absolute risks reported
7. Weaknesses
- Single health system
- Healthy-user and screening differences
- Observational
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Authors acknowledge possible healthy-user and selection bias.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
NNT ~50 over 10 y for obesity-associated cancer, ~167 for cancer death (stats/I-BAR-118_splendid_2022.py); CI log-symmetric.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Directly contradicts "sleeve brings cancer forward": cancer incidence and cancer deaths were lower, in a cohort with one third sleeve.
11. Independent contrary findings
Sleeve-only results not in abstract.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
US data.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Moderate-quality evidence of lower cancer risk after surgery.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | moderate |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Sleeve-specific very long-term cancer risk.
15. Linked fact checks
- Sleeve gastrectomy makes cancer appear decades earlier (it 'kills' and brings cancer forward). – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim