Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-BAR-120 in-depth review

Meta-analysis: anaemia after sleeve

Prevalence of anemia and related nutrient deficiencies after sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview

Nie et al.. Obes Rev 2023 · PMID 36323610 · DOI 10.1111/obr.13516

About 1 in 5 sleeve patients had anaemia 4-5 years after surgery, mostly from iron deficiency; B12 and folate deficiency stayed rare.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Track deficiencies after SG

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

7,639

What was actually found?

Anaemia rising to 18-25%

How large was the observed effect?

Proportions

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Iron checks and supplements matter after sleeve

What are the study's limitations?

Observational

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports iron part; limits B12 part for sleeve

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Whether everyone is affected

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Nie et al.
Journal
Obes Rev
Year
2023
Identifier
PMID 36323610 DOI 10.1111/obr.13516
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

How common are anaemia and related nutrient deficiencies after sleeve gastrectomy over time?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions
Population

Patients after SG

Country

Multinational

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

31 studies, 7,639 patients

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies reporting anaemia/nutrient deficiency after SG

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Sleeve gastrectomy

Comparator

Baseline

Endpoints

Anaemia, ferritin, iron, B12, folate deficiency

Statistical methods

Pooled prevalence by time point; subgroup analysis

5. Actual results

Results

Anaemia 7% at baseline, 10% at 12 mo, 12% at 24 mo, 25% at 36 mo, 20% at 48 mo, 18% at 60 mo. Ferritin deficiency 6% -> 27% at 60 mo; serum iron deficiency 13% -> 6% at 24 mo -> 20% at 60 mo. B12 and folate deficiency remained low. Risk factors: age <=40, preoperative anaemia, insufficient iron supplementation.

Absolute risks

Anaemia about 1 in 5 at 5 years after sleeve.

Authors' conclusion

SG is associated with increased long-term anaemia and decreasing iron stores; guideline iron doses may be insufficient; stricter monitoring needed.

6. Strengths

  • Sleeve-specific
  • Time course

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational, heterogeneous
  • Supplement adherence varies

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Abstract only.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Prevalences; no control group.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows iron deficiency/anaemia rises after sleeve over years, while B12/folate deficiency stays low - partly supports and partly limits the claim.

11. Independent contrary findings

Deficiency is not universal and is treatable.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

International.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Moderate evidence that iron deficiency is a real long-term issue after sleeve.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Optimal iron dosing.

15. Linked fact checks