Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-BAR-128 in-depth review

Meta-analysis: suicide after weight-loss surgery

Risk of suicide after metabolic bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis of matched cohort studies and population-based studies.

Overview

Cui et al.. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2025 · PMID 39516067 · DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.014

Suicide was about twice as frequent after surgery, though still rare (about 2 in 1000).

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Suicide risk after MBS

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

667,257

What was actually found?

HR 2.12

How large was the observed effect?

HR 2.12 (1.54-2.92)

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Mental-health follow-up is important

What are the study's limitations?

Few, overlapping studies

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the claim

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cause

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Cui et al.
Journal
Surg Obes Relat Dis
Year
2025
Identifier
PMID 39516067 DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.014
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

COI statement (PubMed record): Disclosures The authors have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article.

2. Research question

Is the risk of suicide higher in adults treated with metabolic bariatric surgery than without?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Meta-analysis of matched cohort and population-based studies
Population

Adults with obesity

Country

Multinational

Period

Search to 30 April 2024

Sample size

5 studies (3 matched cohorts with 4 cohorts, 2 population-based); 114,615 MBS (272 suicides) vs 552,642 non-surgery (622 suicides)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Matched cohort and population-based studies

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

MBS

Comparator

No MBS

Endpoints

Suicide

Statistical methods

Random effects; PROSPERO CRD42024561042

5. Actual results

Results

Pooled HR 2.12 (1.54-2.92; I2 24%); pooled RR 2.32 (1.55-3.45; I2 58%). Matched cohorts HR 2.64 (1.84-3.77) vs population-based 1.67 (1.32-2.12).

Absolute risks

Crude: about 2.4 vs 1.1 suicides per 1000 patients (computed from abstract counts).

Authors' conclusion

Suicide risk more than doubled after MBS, but absolute risk was low and does not warrant general discouragement of MBS.

6. Strengths

  • Controlled studies only
  • Low-moderate heterogeneity

7. Weaknesses

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Includes overlapping Nordic/Swedish data; counts are not independent confirmations of A-BAR-16.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Crude RR 2.11 matches pooled estimates (stats/I-BAR-128_cui_2025_suicide.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Most recent pooled estimate confirming increased suicide risk after surgery, with low absolute risk.

11. Independent contrary findings

Authors state it does not warrant discouraging surgery.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Includes European data.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports C-BAR-07.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Mechanisms; procedure-specific risk.

15. Linked fact checks