Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-BAR-136 in-depth review

Egyptian trial: gallstones after obesity surgery

Cholelithiasis after bariatric surgery, incidence, and prophylaxis: randomized controlled trial.

Overview

Talha et al.. Surg Endosc 2020 · PMID 31858245 · DOI 10.1007/s00464-019-07323-7

Without preventive medicine, about 22 in 100 patients formed gallstones within a year; a bile-acid medicine lowered this to about 6 in 100.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Gallstones and UDCA

How was the study done?

RCT

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

1,432

What was actually found?

22% vs 6.5%

How large was the observed effect?

NNT 6

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Gallstones are common after rapid weight loss and largely preventable

What are the study's limitations?

Inconsistent numbers in abstract

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the claim

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Egypt

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Exact sleeve rate

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Talha et al.
Journal
Surg Endosc
Year
2020
Identifier
PMID 31858245 DOI 10.1007/s00464-019-07323-7
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

How often do gallstones form after bariatric surgery and does 6 months of UDCA prevent them?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Randomised placebo-controlled trial of UDCA prophylaxis (Alexandria, Egypt)
Population

Morbidly obese patients undergoing OAGB, SG or greater curve plication

Country

Egypt

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

1,530 enrolled, 1,432 analysed

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Excluded prior/concomitant cholecystectomy and missed follow-up

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

UDCA for 6 months

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoints

Gallstone formation at >=1 year, weight loss

Statistical methods

Comparison of incidence; NNT

5. Actual results

Results

Overall cholelithiasis 9.7%. Incidence 22% with placebo vs 6.5% with UDCA; NNT 6. Of those with gallstones, 64.7% had SG vs 28.1% OAGB and 7.2% GCP. Higher %EWL in those who formed stones.

Absolute risks

Placebo arm: 22 in 100 formed gallstones within about a year.

Authors' conclusion

Cholelithiasis after SG and OAGB was higher than GCP; rapid weight loss predicts gallstones; 6 months UDCA is effective prophylaxis.

6. Strengths

  • Large Egyptian RCT
  • Placebo-controlled

7. Weaknesses

  • Abstract numbers internally inconsistent (overall 9.7% vs 22%/6.5%; "RR is 3.4%")
  • Procedure shares among stone formers do not give procedure-specific incidence
  • Short follow-up

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Reporting inconsistencies in abstract; randomisation details not in abstract.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

NNT 6.5 reproduced; overall incidence inconsistent with arm-specific rates unless groups were very unequal (stats/I-BAR-136_talha_2020.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Egyptian randomised data showing gallstones are common after sleeve-dominated bariatric surgery and largely preventable.

11. Independent contrary findings

Not everyone forms stones; UDCA prevents most.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Egyptian setting; biology universal.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports C-BAR-11 in an Egyptian population, with reporting caveats.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Sleeve-specific incidence.

15. Linked fact checks