Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-BAR-140 standard review

Israeli study: rheumatoid arthritis after surgery

The association between bariatric surgery and incident rheumatoid arthritis.

Overview

Jeries et al.. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2026 · PMID 41908723 · DOI 10.1093/rap/rkag025

Rheumatoid arthritis appeared equally rarely in operated and non-operated people (9 cases each).

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

RA after surgery

How was the study done?

Matched cohort

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

19,166

What was actually found?

9 vs 9 cases

How large was the observed effect?

No difference

What do the results mean in everyday life?

No sign of more arthritis

What are the study's limitations?

Very few cases

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts the RA part

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Plausible

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Small effects

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Jeries et al.
Journal
Rheumatol Adv Pract
Year
2026
Identifier
PMID 41908723 DOI 10.1093/rap/rkag025
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Does weight loss after bariatric surgery change the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Retrospective matched cohort (Maccabi Healthcare Services)
Population

Patients with bariatric surgery 2010-2015 and age/sex-matched controls

Country

Israel

Period

2010-2020

Sample size

19,166 (9,583 per group)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

RA confirmed by rheumatologist, serology or DMARD purchase

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Bariatric surgery

Comparator

Age/sex-matched controls

Endpoints

Incident RA

Statistical methods

Incidence comparison

5. Actual results

Results

18 incident RA cases: 9 in each group over mean 7.31 y.

Absolute risks

9/9583 in each group (~0.1%).

Authors' conclusion

Bariatric surgery was not associated with reduced RA risk over 10 years.

6. Strengths

  • Strict RA definition

7. Weaknesses

  • Very few events; underpowered
  • Controls matched only on age and sex

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Low event count.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

9 vs 9 events: no difference, but very imprecise.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

No increase in RA after surgery (consistent with SOS, I-INTC-09).

11. Independent contrary findings

Underpowered.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Israeli data.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Weak evidence of no RA increase.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Other autoimmune diseases.

15. Linked fact checks