Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-BAR-144 standard review

Danish study: acid medicines after sleeve vs bypass

Use of proton pump inhibitors after laparoscopic gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

Overview

Gormsen et al.. Int J Obes (Lond) 2024 · PMID 39043831 · DOI 10.1038/s41366-024-01593-5

Sleeve patients were much more likely to start acid-reducing medicines and to keep taking them than bypass patients.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

PPI use after SG vs RYGB

How was the study done?

National cohort

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

17,740

What was actually found?

More PPI use after SG

How large was the observed effect?

HR 7.06

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Many sleeve patients need acid medicines

What are the study's limitations?

Small SG group

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Directly European

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Lifelong need for all

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Gormsen et al.
Journal
Int J Obes (Lond)
Year
2024
Identifier
PMID 39043831 DOI 10.1038/s41366-024-01593-5
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

COI statement (PubMed record): The authors declare no competing interests. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. The corresponding author had full access to the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

2. Research question

How does long-term PPI use differ after RYGB and SG?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Nationwide register-based cohort (Denmark)
Population

All patients with L-RYGB or L-SG in Denmark 2008-2018

Country

Denmark

Period

2008-2018; median follow-up 11 y (RYGB), 4 y (SG)

Sample size

17,740 (16,096 RYGB, 1,671 SG)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

National registries

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

L-SG

Comparator

L-RYGB

Endpoints

PPI initiation, continuous PPI use, GERD diagnosis

Statistical methods

Kaplan-Meier, Cox, logistic regression

5. Actual results

Results

PPI initiation HR 7.06 (6.42-7.77) SG vs RYGB; continuous PPI OR 1.45 (1.36-1.54); GERD diagnosis HR 1.93 (1.27-2.93). PPI utilisation increased after both procedures.

Absolute risks

not reported in abstract

Authors' conclusion

Risk of initiating and continuing PPI treatment was significantly higher after SG; PPI use increased after both procedures.

6. Strengths

  • Nationwide prescription data

7. Weaknesses

  • Different follow-up lengths
  • Small SG group
  • PPI use also for other indications

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Confounding by indication (procedure choice).

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Relative measures only in abstract; absolute proportions on lifelong PPI not given.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows PPI use is much more frequent after sleeve, partly supporting the "acid drugs" part, but does not show that all patients need lifelong PPIs.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Danish.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports frequent PPI need after sleeve; not universality.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Proportion on continuous PPIs.

15. Linked fact checks