Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-BAR-147 standard review

Meta-analysis: gut hormones after sleeve

Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Ghrelin, GLP-1, PYY, and GIP Gut Hormones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Overview

McCarty et al.. Ann Surg 2020 · PMID 31592891 · DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003614

After sleeve the hunger hormone ghrelin fell and satiety hormones GLP-1 and PYY rose.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Hormone changes after SG

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

653

What was actually found?

Ghrelin down, GLP-1/PYY up

How large was the observed effect?

Hedges' g -1.49 (ghrelin)

What do the results mean in everyday life?

The stomach is a hormone organ; surgery changes it

What are the study's limitations?

Short follow-up

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Premise correct, conclusion not

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Long-term health effects

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
McCarty et al.
Journal
Ann Surg
Year
2020
Identifier
PMID 31592891 DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003614
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

How do ghrelin, GLP-1, PYY and GIP change after sleeve gastrectomy?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis (RCTs and prospective studies)
Population

Patients undergoing SG

Country

Multinational

Period

Search to 1 April 2019

Sample size

28 studies, 653 patients

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

RCTs and prospective studies with pre/post hormone measures

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Sleeve gastrectomy

Comparator

Preoperative

Endpoints

Fasting ghrelin, postprandial GLP-1, PYY, fasting GIP

Statistical methods

Hedges' g, random effects

5. Actual results

Results

Ghrelin decreased (g -1.486, -1.884 to -1.089; I2 91.95%); GLP-1 increased (g 1.095, 0.509 to 1.642); PYY increased (g 1.396, 0.781 to 2.011); GIP unchanged (g -0.213, -1.019 to 0.592). Mean follow-up 11.7 months.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Fasting ghrelin decreased and postprandial GLP-1 and PYY increased after SG; GIP unchanged.

6. Strengths

  • Quantitative synthesis of hormone changes

7. Weaknesses

  • Short follow-up
  • High heterogeneity
  • Small total sample

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Abstract only.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Large standardised effects with high heterogeneity.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Confirms Elawady's premise that the stomach is an endocrine organ whose hormone output changes after sleeve; these changes are, however, part of how the operation improves weight and glucose, not evidence of harm.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

International.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports the physiological premise; does not support the conclusion of harm.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Long-term hormone adaptation.

15. Linked fact checks