Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-BAR-149 in-depth review

Meta-analysis: vitamin shortages 5-17 years after surgery

Long-term prevalence of vitamin deficiencies after bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis.

Overview

Chen et al.. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024 · PMID 39030449 · DOI 10.1007/s00423-024-03422-9

Years after surgery, about 1 in 3 people lacked vitamin D and about 1 in 12 lacked vitamin B12.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Long-term vitamin deficiencies

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

54 studies

What was actually found?

Vitamin D 35.8%, B12 8.5%

How large was the observed effect?

Proportions

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Lifelong vitamin checks are needed

What are the study's limitations?

Heterogeneous

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the claim in substance, not universality

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Comparison with non-operated people

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Chen et al.
Journal
Langenbecks Arch Surg
Year
2024
Identifier
PMID 39030449 DOI 10.1007/s00423-024-03422-9
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Grants listed: Guangdong Medical Research Foundation, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Funding by Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou, the Guangdong Province general university youth innovative talent project, the scientific research project of the Chinese medicine bureau in Guangdong Province

2. Research question

What is the long-term (>=5 y) prevalence of vitamin deficiencies after bariatric surgery?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with >=5 y follow-up
Population

Patients after bariatric surgery (RYGB, SG, BPD-DS and others)

Country

Multinational

Period

Search to June 2023

Sample size

54 articles; follow-up 5-17 years

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Clinical studies with >=5 y follow-up

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Bariatric surgery

Comparator

Between procedures and regions

Endpoints

Vitamin A, B12, D, E, K, folate deficiency

Statistical methods

Pooled prevalence; subgroup and meta-regression analyses

5. Actual results

Results

Long-term deficiency prevalence: vitamin D 35.8%, vitamin E 16.5%, vitamin A 13.4%, vitamin K 9.6%, vitamin B12 8.5%. Vitamin A and folate deficiency increased with follow-up time. RYGB had more B12 deficiency than SG and BPD-DS. Europe: vitamin A deficiency 25.8% vs 0.8% in America.

Absolute risks

Vitamin D deficiency in about 1 in 3, B12 deficiency in about 1 in 12 long-term.

Authors' conclusion

High prevalence of long-term vitamin deficiencies, varying by region, procedure and follow-up; targeted supplementation programmes are needed.

6. Strengths

  • Long-term studies only
  • Large number of studies

7. Weaknesses

  • Heterogeneous definitions and supplementation
  • Preoperative prevalence not subtracted

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Abstract only.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Prevalences without non-surgical comparator; vitamin D deficiency is also common in people with obesity without surgery.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows that vitamin deficiencies persist in a substantial minority for 5-17 years - supports the "long-term" part of the claim, while showing it is not universal.

11. Independent contrary findings

Deficiencies also exist before surgery.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Includes European data.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Moderate evidence supporting long-term deficiency risk.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Effect of adherence.

15. Linked fact checks