Cross-sectional studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-CHK-109 standard review

Antibiotic-free chickens still get woody breast

Research note: Influence of growing systems (conventional, organic, raised-without-antibiotics) on myopathies of broiler breast fillets.

Overview

Barbut S et al.. Poult Sci 2026 · PMID 42096902 · DOI 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106997

Woody breast and related defects occurred in conventional, antibiotic-free and organic broilers; heavier fillets were more affected.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Does the production system (conventional, raised without antibiotics, organic) affect breast myopathies?

How was the study done?

Observational comparison of production systems within one fast-growing genotype over two years

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

not stated in abstract

What was actually found?

WS: no difference between conventional and RWA (about 85% with noticeable WS); organic similar. Severe WB more prevalent in RWA birds in 2024; in 2025 both organic and RWA had lower severe WB than conventional. SM severity consistently greater in RWA than conventional. Fillet weight strongly associated with myopathy severity in all systems.

How large was the observed effect?

WS: no difference between conventional and RWA (about 85% with noticeable WS); organic similar. Severe WB more prevalent in RWA birds in 2024; in 2025 both organic and RWA had lower severe WB than conventional. SM severity consistently greater in RWA than conventional. Fillet weight strongly associated with myopathy severity in all systems.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

The problem follows fast growth, not antibiotic use.

What are the study's limitations?

Sample size not in abstract; Inconsistent results between years; Research note

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Confirms the 'wood-like' breast; limits the attribution to antibiotics.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Production systems similar to EU ones.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot rank systems reliably (inconsistent between years).

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Barbut S et al.
Journal
Poult Sci
Year
2026
Identifier
PMID 42096902 DOI 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106997
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Does the production system (conventional, raised without antibiotics, organic) affect breast myopathies?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cross-sectional study – Observational comparison of production systems within one fast-growing genotype over two years
Population

Fast-growing broilers from three production systems

Country

Canada (presumed; not stated in abstract)

Period

2024-2025

Sample size

not stated in abstract

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

as described in the abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Raised-without-antibiotics (RWA) and organic systems

Comparator

Conventional system

Endpoints

White striping, woody breast, spaghetti meat severity

Statistical methods

as reported in the abstract

5. Actual results

Results

WS: no difference between conventional and RWA (about 85% with noticeable WS); organic similar. Severe WB more prevalent in RWA birds in 2024; in 2025 both organic and RWA had lower severe WB than conventional. SM severity consistently greater in RWA than conventional. Fillet weight strongly associated with myopathy severity in all systems.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Production system influenced WB and SM but not WS; heavier fillets consistently had more severe myopathies.

6. Strengths

  • Same genotype across systems
  • Two production years

7. Weaknesses

  • Sample size not in abstract
  • Inconsistent results between years
  • Research note

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Observational; confounding by system-specific management.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

No consistent reduction of myopathies when antibiotics were not used; growth (fillet weight) is the consistent factor.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Tests whether antibiotic-free production avoids woody breast.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

13. Overall methodological judgement

Woody breast and related defects occurred in conventional, antibiotic-free and organic broilers; heavier fillets were more affected.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks