Measurement / residue studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-CHK-127 standard review
Arsenic feed additives raised arsenic in Chinese market chicken
Public Health Risk of Arsenic Species in Chicken Tissues from Live Poultry Markets of Guangdong Province, China.
Overview
Hu Y et al.. Environ Sci Technol 2017 · PMID 28219238 · DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b06258
Where roxarsone was used, chicken and especially liver contained more arsenic; estimated cancer risk was above priority levels for many adults.
Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
What arsenic species are in chicken tissues and feeds in Guangdong, and what is the cancer risk?
- How was the study done?
Exposure measurement of feeds and chicken tissues from live poultry markets
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
not stated in abstract
- What was actually found?
Feeds with ROX had inorganic arsenic 0.19-9.7 mg/kg. Livers had much higher total arsenic than muscle; urban-market muscle higher than rural. Incremental lifetime cancer risk above the 10^-4 priority level for 70% (Guangzhou) and 30% (Lianzhou) of adults.
- How large was the observed effect?
Feeds with ROX had inorganic arsenic 0.19-9.7 mg/kg. Livers had much higher total arsenic than muscle; urban-market muscle higher than rural. Incremental lifetime cancer risk above the 10^-4 priority level for 70% (Guangzhou) and 30% (Lianzhou) of adults.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Where arsenic drugs are allowed, chicken can be a relevant arsenic source.
- What are the study's limitations?
Regional; Risk model assumptions; sample size not in abstract
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports the mechanism; region-specific.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Not applicable to EU production.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Does not show actual cancer cases.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Hu Y et al.
- Journal
- Environ Sci Technol
- Year
- 2017
- Identifier
- PMID 28219238 DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b06258
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
not stated in abstract
2. Research question
What arsenic species are in chicken tissues and feeds in Guangdong, and what is the cancer risk?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Measurement / residue study – Exposure measurement of feeds and chicken tissues from live poultry markets
- Population
Chicken tissues (liver, breast, drumstick) and commercial feeds
- Country
China
- Period
not stated
- Sample size
not stated in abstract
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
as described in the abstract
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Roxarsone-containing feeds
- Comparator
Feeds without ROX
- Endpoints
Arsenic species; incremental lifetime cancer risk
- Statistical methods
as reported in the abstract
5. Actual results
- Results
Feeds with ROX had inorganic arsenic 0.19-9.7 mg/kg. Livers had much higher total arsenic than muscle; urban-market muscle higher than rural. Incremental lifetime cancer risk above the 10^-4 priority level for 70% (Guangzhou) and 30% (Lianzhou) of adults.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
There is a significant need to phase out arsenic-based feed additives in China.
6. Strengths
- Feed and tissue measured
7. Weaknesses
- Regional
- Risk model assumptions; sample size not in abstract
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- none applicable
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Exposure study.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Higher risk estimate than US/other Chinese data; depends on intake assumptions.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Shows that where roxarsone is used, risk estimates can exceed priority thresholds.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
13. Overall methodological judgement
Where roxarsone was used, chicken and especially liver contained more arsenic; estimated cancer risk was above priority levels for many adults.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | low |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | mixed |
| Regional transferability | low |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
15. Linked fact checks
- Chickens were fed arsenical drugs (roxarsone) that raise carcinogenic inorganic arsenic in chicken meat and in consumers. – Studies supporting the claim