Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-DIAB-102 in-depth review

How often lifestyle change puts type 2 diabetes into remission (Look AHEAD)

Association of an intensive lifestyle intervention with remission of type 2 diabetes.

Overview

Gregg EW et al.. JAMA 2012 · PMID 23288372 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.67929

About 1 in 9 people reached remission in the first year with an intensive lifestyle programme, but only 3.5% stayed in remission for 4 years.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Measure remission in a lifestyle trial.

How was the study done?

Analysis of a large RCT.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

4,503 adults.

What was actually found?

11.5% vs 2.0% (year 1); 3.5% sustained 4 years.

How large was the observed effect?

NNT about 10 (year 1).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Lifestyle helps, but lasting remission is uncommon.

What are the study's limitations?

Exploratory analysis.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts 'cure' as a typical outcome.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot apply to T1D.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Gregg EW et al.
Journal
JAMA
Year
2012
Identifier
PMID 23288372 DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.67929
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NIH (record).

2. Research question

How often does an intensive lifestyle intervention produce remission of T2D?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Ancillary observational analysis of the Look AHEAD RCT
Population

Overweight/obese adults with T2D

Country

USA

Period

2001-2008

Sample size

4,503 (ILI 2241; DSE 2262)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

BMI >=25, T2D

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Intensive lifestyle intervention

Comparator

Diabetes support and education

Endpoints

Partial or complete remission

Statistical methods

Prevalence with 95% CIs

5. Actual results

Results

Any remission 11.5% (10.1-12.8%) year 1 and 7.3% (6.2-8.4%) year 4 vs 2.0% control; continuous remission for 4 years 3.5% vs 0.5%. Weight difference -7.9% at year 1.

Absolute risks

Year 1 difference 9.5 points (NNT about 10.5); year 4 5.3 points (stats/C-DIAB-03_remission.py)

Authors' conclusion

Intensive lifestyle intervention was associated with greater likelihood of partial remission, but absolute rates were modest.

6. Strengths

  • Very large
  • Randomised comparison
  • 4-year data

7. Weaknesses

  • Exploratory ancillary analysis
  • Longer diabetes duration than DiRECT

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Secondary analysis.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Precise; modest absolute effect.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Under a conventional lifestyle programme, remission is uncommon (about 1 in 9 in year 1, 1 in 30 sustained 4 years), showing that 'cure' through diet is not typical.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly applicable; same biology and clinical standards in Europe.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Calibrates expectations: remission possible but uncommon without intensive weight loss.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks