Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study I-DRY-103 in-depth review

Extra dairy helps children build bone

The Effects of Dairy Product Supplementation on Bone Health Indices in Children Aged 3 to 18 Years: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Overview

Hidayat K et al.. Adv Nutr 2023 · PMID 37414219 · DOI 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.06.010

In 21 trials, children given extra dairy gained about 2-4% more bone mineral and grew slightly taller.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test whether extra dairy improves children's bones.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis of randomised trials.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

21 trials, children 3-18 years.

What was actually found?

More bone mineral (about 2-4%), slightly more height, higher IGF-I.

How large was the observed effect?

Whole-body BMC +25 g (+3%).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Milk and other dairy help growing bones; removing them needs a calcium plan.

What are the study's limitations?

Bone density is a surrogate; some authors work for a dairy company.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts the idea that milk is harmful for children; confirms that dairy raises IGF-I.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applies everywhere.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show fewer fractures later in life.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Hidayat K et al.
Journal
Adv Nutr
Year
2023
Identifier
PMID 37414219 DOI 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.06.010
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections

none (PubMed and Crossref checked)

Extent checked
full text
Conflicts of interest and funding

Funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China; three authors employed by Yili Group (a dairy producer).

2. Research question

Does dairy supplementation improve bone mass and growth in children and adolescents?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of RCTs (PubMed, Web of Science); RoB by Cochrane tool; certainty by NutriGrade
Population

Children and adolescents 3-18 y

Country

Multinational (Western and Asian trials)

Period

Searches to 2023

Sample size

21 publications (RCTs)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Parallel or crossover RCTs, dairy (milk 15 RCTs, mixed dairy 4, cheese 1, yogurt 1) added to habitual diet vs control/placebo

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Dairy supplementation (150-1723 mg calcium/day where reported)

Comparator

Habitual diet, juice or placebo

Endpoints

BMC, aBMD, height, bone turnover markers, PTH, 25(OH)D, IGF-I

Statistical methods

Random-effects WMD; subgroup and meta-regression; Begg/Egger

5. Actual results

Results

Whole-body BMC +25.37 g (+3.0%), whole-body aBMD +0.016 g/cm2 (+1.8%), total hip BMC +0.49 g, femoral neck aBMD +0.030 g/cm2, lumbar spine BMC +0.85 g (+4.1%), height +0.21 cm; serum IGF-I +19.89 (units given as nmol/L), urinary deoxypyridinoline -1.78 nmol/mmol creatinine, PTH -10.46 pg/mL; 25(OH)D +4.98 ng/mL with vitamin D-fortified dairy. Effects consistent across sex, region, baseline calcium, duration and Tanner stage. Certainty (NutriGrade): high for height and whole-body BMC/aBMD; moderate for IGF-I and several others.

Absolute risks

not applicable (continuous outcomes; no fracture endpoints)

Authors' conclusion

Dairy supplementation during growth leads to a small but significant increase in bone mineral mass parameters.

6. Strengths

  • Only RCTs
  • Many bone sites; consistent subgroups
  • Certainty grading

7. Weaknesses

  • Dairy-industry-employed co-authors
  • Surrogate outcomes (BMC), not fractures
  • Small absolute effects
  • Reported IGF-I increase implausibly large (possible unit error; see stats/C-DRY-06_igf1.py)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Two-database search; industry COI; otherwise reasonable methods.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Mean differences are modest (1-4% bone mineral); clinical fracture benefit not shown. The IGF-I magnitude is not used.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Directly relevant to the safety question: randomised trials show that adding dairy (mostly milk) increases bone mineral and slightly increases height in children; removing milk and yogurt without substitutes removes this source. It also shows that dairy raises circulating IGF-I in children, consistent with the mechanism part of C-DRY-06.

11. Independent contrary findings

Effects are small; fracture benefit in children not shown; calcium from other sources may give similar bone effects (not assessed here).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Biological; applies to Egypt and Europe.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Moderate-to-high certainty that dairy modestly helps bone accrual in children; supports the existing safety note.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Long-term fracture outcomes; comparison with fortified non-dairy alternatives.

15. Linked fact checks