Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-EGG-110 standard review

More than one egg a day not linked to heart disease

Association Between Egg Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Overview

Krittanawong C et al.. Am J Med 2021 · PMID 32653422 · DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.046

HR 0.99 (0.93-1.06) for cardiovascular events in 1.4 million people.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Pool cohort studies on eggs and CVD.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

23 studies, 1.4 million people.

What was actually found?

No higher CVD risk.

How large was the observed effect?

HR 0.99.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Eating eggs regularly was not linked to more heart disease.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational; overlapping studies.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts it.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

It cannot prove eggs protect the heart.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Krittanawong C et al.
Journal
Am J Med
Year
2021
Identifier
PMID 32653422 DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.046
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Is egg consumption associated with cardiovascular disease events?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of prospective studies
Population

23 prospective studies, 1,415,839 individuals

Country

Multinational

Period

Search to January 2020

Sample size

1,415,839 participants; 157,324 CVD events

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not detailed in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

>1 egg/day

Comparator

No or 1 egg/day

Endpoints

Overall CVD events; coronary artery disease

Statistical methods

Random-effects meta-analysis; heterogeneity analyses

5. Actual results

Results

More than 1 egg/day vs no or 1 egg/day: CVD HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.93-1.06; I2 72.1%); coronary artery disease HR 0.89 (0.86-0.93; I2 0%).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Higher egg consumption (>1/day) was not associated with increased CVD risk and was associated with lower CAD risk.

6. Strengths

  • Large number of participants
  • Median follow-up 12.3 years

7. Weaknesses

  • Comparator category includes 1 egg/day; crude high vs low comparison
  • Overlaps with other meta-analyses

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Abstract-level; overlapping primary studies.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

CVD CI log-symmetric; the inverse CAD finding with I2 0% is surprising and should not be over-read (possible confounding).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Contradicts the claim that eggs raise CVD risk at intakes above one per day.

11. Independent contrary findings

Zhao 2022 (I-EGG-109).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Mixed regions.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports no association; overlaps with other syntheses, so not independent confirmation.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Dose-response not reported in abstract.

15. Linked fact checks