Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-FAST-107 in-depth review
Fasting then vegetarian diet in rheumatoid arthritis
Controlled trial of fasting and one-year vegetarian diet in rheumatoid arthritis.
Overview
Kjeldsen-Kragh J et al.. Lancet 1991 · PMID 1681264 · DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91770-u
People with RA who fasted and then ate a vegetarian diet had fewer painful joints and lower inflammation over a year than controls.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Test a fasting-plus-diet regimen in RA.
- How was the study done?
53 patients randomised; 1-year follow-up.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
53 Norwegian patients with RA.
- What was actually found?
Improvement in joint counts, pain, stiffness, ESR and CRP in the diet group; persisted at 1 year.
- How large was the observed effect?
Not given in abstract.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
A diet regimen may add benefit for some RA patients alongside their medicines.
- What are the study's limitations?
Small, unblinded, confounded by setting.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Partly supports 'fasting treats joint pain'; does not support stopping medication.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applies; same physiology.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Effect of fasting alone; effect in lupus or MS.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Kjeldsen-Kragh J et al.
- Journal
- Lancet
- Year
- 1991
- Identifier
- PMID 1681264 DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91770-u
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref update-to/updated-by check
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
not stated in abstract
2. Research question
Does a subtotal fast followed by a one-year vegetarian diet improve rheumatoid arthritis?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Randomised controlled trial – Randomised, single-blind controlled trial
- Population
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis
- Country
Norway
- Period
not stated in abstract
- Sample size
53 (27 diet, 26 control)
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
not stated in abstract
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
7-10-day subtotal fast at a health farm, then gluten-free vegan diet for 3.5 months, then lactovegetarian diet
- Comparator
4 weeks at a convalescent home with ordinary diet
- Endpoints
Tender and swollen joints, Ritchie index, pain, morning stiffness, grip strength, ESR, CRP, WBC, HAQ
- Statistical methods
Between-group comparisons
5. Actual results
- Results
After 4 weeks the diet group improved significantly in tender joints, Ritchie index, swollen joints, pain score, morning stiffness, grip strength, ESR, CRP, white cell count and HAQ; the control group improved only in pain. Benefits persisted at one year with significant advantages in all measured indices.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
This dietary regimen seems to be a useful supplement to conventional medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
6. Strengths
- Randomised with control group
- One-year follow-up
- Objective markers (ESR, CRP)
7. Weaknesses
- Small
- Single-blind; different settings (health farm vs convalescent home)
- Fasting combined with long-term diet change; fasting effect not isolated
- Old trial; 5 comments in PubMed
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- RoB 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- high
- Rationale
Lack of blinding of participants, different care settings, small sample.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Direction consistent; effect sizes not in abstract. Benefit is attributed to the whole regimen, not to fasting alone.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Strongest classic supporting evidence for 'fasting helps joint pain' - as a supplement to medical treatment, followed by a long-term diet change.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Universal biology; applies in Europe and Egypt.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Supports a modest add-on effect in RA; authors explicitly frame it as supplement to conventional treatment.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | high |
| Precision of results | low |
| Directness | indirect |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | mixed |
| Regional transferability | moderate |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |