Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-FAST-107 in-depth review

Fasting then vegetarian diet in rheumatoid arthritis

Controlled trial of fasting and one-year vegetarian diet in rheumatoid arthritis.

Overview

Kjeldsen-Kragh J et al.. Lancet 1991 · PMID 1681264 · DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91770-u

People with RA who fasted and then ate a vegetarian diet had fewer painful joints and lower inflammation over a year than controls.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test a fasting-plus-diet regimen in RA.

How was the study done?

53 patients randomised; 1-year follow-up.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

53 Norwegian patients with RA.

What was actually found?

Improvement in joint counts, pain, stiffness, ESR and CRP in the diet group; persisted at 1 year.

How large was the observed effect?

Not given in abstract.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

A diet regimen may add benefit for some RA patients alongside their medicines.

What are the study's limitations?

Small, unblinded, confounded by setting.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports 'fasting treats joint pain'; does not support stopping medication.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applies; same physiology.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Effect of fasting alone; effect in lupus or MS.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Kjeldsen-Kragh J et al.
Journal
Lancet
Year
1991
Identifier
PMID 1681264 DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91770-u
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref update-to/updated-by check
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Does a subtotal fast followed by a one-year vegetarian diet improve rheumatoid arthritis?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Randomised, single-blind controlled trial
Population

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Country

Norway

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

53 (27 diet, 26 control)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

7-10-day subtotal fast at a health farm, then gluten-free vegan diet for 3.5 months, then lactovegetarian diet

Comparator

4 weeks at a convalescent home with ordinary diet

Endpoints

Tender and swollen joints, Ritchie index, pain, morning stiffness, grip strength, ESR, CRP, WBC, HAQ

Statistical methods

Between-group comparisons

5. Actual results

Results

After 4 weeks the diet group improved significantly in tender joints, Ritchie index, swollen joints, pain score, morning stiffness, grip strength, ESR, CRP, white cell count and HAQ; the control group improved only in pain. Benefits persisted at one year with significant advantages in all measured indices.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

This dietary regimen seems to be a useful supplement to conventional medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

6. Strengths

  • Randomised with control group
  • One-year follow-up
  • Objective markers (ESR, CRP)

7. Weaknesses

  • Small
  • Single-blind; different settings (health farm vs convalescent home)
  • Fasting combined with long-term diet change; fasting effect not isolated
  • Old trial; 5 comments in PubMed

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
high
Rationale

Lack of blinding of participants, different care settings, small sample.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Direction consistent; effect sizes not in abstract. Benefit is attributed to the whole regimen, not to fasting alone.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Strongest classic supporting evidence for 'fasting helps joint pain' - as a supplement to medical treatment, followed by a long-term diet change.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Universal biology; applies in Europe and Egypt.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports a modest add-on effect in RA; authors explicitly frame it as supplement to conventional treatment.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biashigh
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks