Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-FRU-105 in-depth review

Should people with type 2 diabetes cut down on fruit?

Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes--a randomized trial.

Overview

Christensen AS et al.. Nutr J 2013 · PMID 23497350 · DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-29

Telling newly diagnosed patients to eat less fruit did not improve their blood sugar, weight or waist.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test fruit restriction advice.

How was the study done?

RCT, 12 weeks.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

63 adults with new T2D.

What was actually found?

No HbA1c difference.

How large was the observed effect?

0.19% (-0.23 to 0.62).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Whole fruit can stay in the diet of people with type 2 diabetes.

What are the study's limitations?

Small, short, open.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports C-FRU-05.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

It does not cover juices or insulin users.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Christensen AS et al.
Journal
Nutr J
Year
2013
Identifier
PMID 23497350 DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-29 · PMC3599615
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref works API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Not stated in abstract.

2. Research question

Does advice to restrict fruit change HbA1c in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Open randomised controlled trial, two parallel groups, 12 weeks
Population

63 overweight adults with newly diagnosed T2D

Country

Not stated in abstract (trial NCT01010594)

Period

12 weeks

Sample size

63

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Newly diagnosed T2D.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Medical nutrition therapy + advice to eat >=2 pieces of fruit/day

Comparator

Medical nutrition therapy + advice to eat <=2 pieces/day

Endpoints

HbA1c; weight; waist; fruit intake

Statistical methods

Intention to treat

5. Actual results

Results

High-fruit group +125 g/day fruit (95% CI 78-172); low-fruit group -51 g. HbA1c fell in both groups with no difference (0.19%, -0.23 to 0.62); no difference in weight or waist loss. All patients completed.

Absolute risks

Not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Fruit intake should not be restricted in patients with type 2 diabetes.

6. Strengths

  • Randomised, ITT, no dropouts
  • Direct question

7. Weaknesses

  • Small; 12 weeks
  • Open-label; self-reported intake
  • Newly diagnosed patients only

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Open design; self-reported intake.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

CI consistent with the point estimate; upper limit 0.62% leaves imprecision (stats/C-FRU-05_du2017_christensen.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Directly supports the point that whole fruit need not be restricted in T2D (C-FRU-05).

11. Independent contrary findings

Not applicable to juices or dried fruit in large amounts.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Small but direct RCT support for not restricting whole fruit.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Insulin-treated patients; dates and dried fruit.

15. Linked fact checks