Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-FSH-118 in-depth review

Fish farming still eats a lot of wild fish

A review of the global use of fishmeal and fish oil and the Fish In:Fish Out metric.

Overview

Majluf P et al.. Sci Adv 2024 · PMID 39413173 · DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adn5650

Farmed carnivorous species such as salmon and shrimp use most of the world's fishmeal and fish oil, made mainly from small wild fish; the usual efficiency metric hides this.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Review FMFO use and the FIFO metric.

How was the study done?

Review.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Global feed data.

What was actually found?

Carnivorous aquaculture uses most FMFO; FIFO is misleading.

How large was the observed effect?

Not in abstract.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Farming carnivorous fish still depends on wild fish.

What are the study's limitations?

Abstract only.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Exact net balance per species.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Majluf P et al.
Journal
Sci Adv
Year
2024
Identifier
PMID 39413173 DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adn5650
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref checked
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Does the Fish In:Fish Out metric correctly show decreasing dependence of aquaculture on wild fish?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Narrative review – Review of fishmeal/fish oil use and of the FIFO metric
Population

Global aquaculture feed supply

Country

Global

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

Not applicable

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Fishmeal and fish oil use

Comparator

Industry FIFO claims

Endpoints

Wild fish use

Statistical methods

Not stated in abstract

5. Actual results

Results

'Aquacultured carnivorous species consume most of the world's fishmeal and fish oil (FMFO), which itself is primarily derived from small pelagic fish.' The FIFO metric is 'misleading' because it assumes constant yields, inclusion rates and feed conversion ratios; averaging carnivores and herbivores 'conceal[s] the high feed requirements of carnivore species'. Increasing use of by-products 'does not demonstrate a decreased use of wild fish'.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Industry FIFO values understate the dependence of carnivorous aquaculture (salmon, shrimp) on wild fish.

6. Strengths

  • Recent, critical analysis of the metric used to claim improvement

7. Weaknesses

  • Abstract only
  • Authors linked to ocean-conservation research; methods not seen

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Review; abstract only.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-FSH-11: carnivorous aquaculture still consumes most fishmeal/fish oil from wild small pelagic fish; contests the 'decreasing dependence' interpretation of FIFO in I-FSH-114.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports the core of C-FSH-11; disagrees with industry-based FIFO trends.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks