Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-FSH-15 standard review

Toxic metals in North African seafood (meta-analysis)

Toxic trace elements in fish and seafood from North African coasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis of contamination levels and health risk assessment.

Overview

Nahal A & Mehouel F. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2026 · PMID 42250752 · DOI 10.1016/j.yrtph.2026.106156

Mercury and cadmium in seafood signalled potential concern in Egypt and Tunisia.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Pool data.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

45 studies.

What was actually found?

Hg/Cd concern.

How large was the observed effect?

Hg 0.29 mg/kg pooled.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Monitor seafood.

What are the study's limitations?

Heterogeneous.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts 'sea fish is cleanest'.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Low.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Nahal A & Mehouel F
Journal
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Year
2026
Identifier
PMID 42250752 DOI 10.1016/j.yrtph.2026.106156
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Declaration of competing interest The author is an Editorial Board Member/Editor-in-Chief/Associate Editor/Guest Editor for this journaland was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

2. Research question

Pooled levels of Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr, As in North African seafood and risk

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of toxic trace elements in North African seafood
Population

Fish and seafood

Country

North Africa (incl. Egypt)

Period

1986-2025

Sample size

45 studies

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Edible muscle data

4. Methods and endpoints

Endpoints

Pooled concentrations; THQ

Statistical methods

Random effects (R meta)

5. Actual results

Results

Pooled mg/kg ww: As 3.81, Cr 1.54, Pb 1.06, Hg 0.29, Cd 0.24; THQ for Cd and Hg indicated potential concern in Egypt and Tunisia.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Targeted monitoring needed.

6. Strengths

  • Systematic

7. Weaknesses

  • Heterogeneous studies
  • Mixed farmed/wild

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-FSH-14.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Low.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Regional signal for Hg in seafood.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitylow
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks