Cross-sectional studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-GRN-104 in-depth review

Coeliac disease affects about 1 in 190 Egyptian children

Prevalence of celiac disease in Egyptian children disputes the east-west agriculture-dependent spread of the disease.

Overview

Abu-Zekry M et al.. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008 · PMID 18664863 · DOI 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31815ce5d1

Screening of 1500 Egyptian children found coeliac disease in 0.53%, and much more often in children with diarrhoea or type 1 diabetes.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Measure coeliac disease frequency in Egyptian children.

How was the study done?

Blood tests and biopsies.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

1900 children in three groups.

What was actually found?

0.53% in the general sample; 4.7% and 6.4% in risk groups.

How large was the observed effect?

About 1 in 187.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Coeliac disease is not rare in Egypt.

What are the study's limitations?

Single study; children only.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts the denial of gluten-related disease.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Comparable to Europe.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Does not give adult figures.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Abu-Zekry M et al.
Journal
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
Year
2008
Identifier
PMID 18664863 DOI 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31815ce5d1
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract/PubMed record

2. Research question

How common is coeliac disease in Egyptian children?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cross-sectional study – Population screening study (cross-sectional) with biopsy confirmation
Population

Egyptian children: general population sample, children with diarrhoea/failure to thrive, children with type 1 diabetes

Country

Egypt

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

1500 general population + 150 with diarrhoea/failure to thrive + 250 with type 1 diabetes

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Age 7 months-18 years (general sample)

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Coeliac serology (IgA anti-tTG, EMA) and small-bowel biopsy

Comparator

none

Endpoints

Prevalence of coeliac disease

Statistical methods

Proportions with 95% CI

5. Actual results

Results

General population: 8/1500 = 0.53% (95% CI 0.17-0.89), at least 1 in 187. Diarrhoea/failure to thrive: 7/150 = 4.7% (1.4-7.9). Type 1 diabetes: 16/250 positive for both IgA anti-tTG and EMA = 6.4% (3.4-9.4).

Absolute risks

0.53% of children in the general sample

Authors' conclusion

Coeliac disease is a frequent disorder among Egyptian children, both in the general population and at-risk groups.

6. Strengths

  • Population sample from Egypt
  • Serology plus biopsy confirmation

7. Weaknesses

  • Single study; sampling frame details not in abstract
  • Reported CI is a Wald interval (stats/C-GRN-01)
  • Diabetes group based on serology only

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Prevalence study; representativeness uncertain.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Recalculated: Wald CI reproduces the reported 0.17-0.89%; Wilson CI 0.27-1.05% is more appropriate for a rare outcome.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows that the gluten-driven disease the claim denies is present in Egypt at roughly the global frequency.

11. Independent contrary findings

None.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Prevalence similar to European estimates (I-WHT-04).

13. Overall methodological judgement

Directly relevant regional evidence.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Adult prevalence in Egypt; diagnosis rates.

15. Linked fact checks