Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-GUT-122 standard review

Treating H. pylori prevents stomach cancer

Eradication Therapy to Prevent Gastric Cancer in Helicobacterpylori-Positive Individuals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.

Overview

Ford AC et al.. Gastroenterology 2025 · PMID 39824392 · DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.12.033

In randomised trials, clearing H. pylori lowered stomach cancer by about a third and stomach cancer deaths by about a fifth.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Update evidence on eradication and gastric cancer.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

11 RCTs, 13 observational studies.

What was actually found?

Fewer cancers and cancer deaths after eradication.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 0.64 incidence; 0.78 mortality.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Treating the infection protects against stomach cancer.

What are the study's limitations?

Regional mix of trials.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts the claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable; lower baseline risk in Europe.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot give exact absolute benefit for Egypt.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Ford AC et al.
Journal
Gastroenterology
Year
2025
Identifier
PMID 39824392 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.12.033
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

World Health Organization grant (PubMed record)

2. Research question

Does H. pylori eradication prevent gastric cancer?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies
Population

H. pylori-positive adults without neoplasia, or after endoscopic resection of early gastric neoplasia

Country

International

Period

Search to 4 Oct 2024

Sample size

11 RCTs and 13 observational studies

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Follow-up >=2 years; control placebo or no eradication

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Eradication therapy

Comparator

Placebo / no eradication

Endpoints

Gastric cancer incidence and mortality

Statistical methods

Pooled relative risks

5. Actual results

Results

RCTs: gastric cancer RR 0.64 (0.48-0.84) in healthy infected people (8 RCTs); 0.52 (0.38-0.71) after EMR (3 RCTs); gastric cancer death RR 0.78 (0.62-0.98) (5 RCTs). Observational: RR 0.56 (0.43-0.73) and 0.19 (0.06-0.61).

Absolute risks

Not reported in abstract

Authors' conclusion

Eradication therapy prevents gastric cancer in H. pylori-positive individuals, consistently across designs.

6. Strengths

  • RCT evidence including mortality
  • Update of earlier review

7. Weaknesses

  • Trial regions not detailed in abstract (earlier version mostly East Asian)
  • Overlaps with I-GUT-03 (earlier version)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

Experienced review team.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Supersedes I-GUT-03; count once.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Newest high-certainty evidence that treating H. pylori prevents gastric cancer and cancer deaths.

11. Independent contrary findings

None of comparable quality.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Baseline gastric cancer risk differs by region; relative effect likely similar.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Strong evidence against calling the H. pylori paradigm a 'crime'.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Population screening in low-incidence regions.

15. Linked fact checks