Case series / case reportindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-INS-107 in-depth review

Growth failure from poorly controlled type 1 diabetes in Sudan

Mauriac Syndrome in Sudanese Children: An Old Syndrome Still Existing in Resource-Limited Countries.

Overview

Ismail MM et al.. Pediatr Diabetes 2025 · PMID 40904852 · DOI 10.1155/pedi/7047312

Children with long-standing poor control were short and had enlarged livers; most improved when their insulin treatment was intensified.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Describe Mauriac syndrome in Sudanese children.

How was the study done?

Record review with follow-up.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

37 children.

What was actually found?

57% improved with better control; nephropathy in one third.

How large was the observed effect?

Not applicable.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Too little insulin effect, not insulin itself, stunts growth.

What are the study's limitations?

Small, no control group.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts 'insulin causes short stature'.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Rare in Europe today.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot give exact effect sizes.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Ismail MM et al.
Journal
Pediatr Diabetes
Year
2025
Identifier
PMID 40904852 DOI 10.1155/pedi/7047312
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No conflicts declared (record).

2. Research question

What are the features and outcomes of Mauriac syndrome (growth failure with poor control) in Sudanese children?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Case series / case report – Hospital-based cross-sectional record review with follow-up after re-education and intensified management
Population

Children and adolescents with T1D (and 2 with neonatal diabetes) and Mauriac syndrome

Country

Sudan

Period

As in paper

Sample size

37

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Clinical diagnosis of Mauriac syndrome

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Prolonged inadequate glycaemic control

Comparator

None (before/after intensification)

Endpoints

Growth, liver size, complications, outcome

Statistical methods

Descriptive

5. Actual results

Results

37 patients, median age 12; short stature and hepatomegaly with prolonged poor control; nephropathy in 33.3%; after re-education and intensified management 56.8% improved (smaller liver with or without faster growth), 18.9% static, 21.6% lost to follow-up, 1 died (2.7%).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Mauriac syndrome still exists in resource-limited settings and can be reversed with good metabolic control.

6. Strengths

  • Arab-region/African data
  • Outcome after intensification reported

7. Weaknesses

  • Small, uncontrolled
  • Clinical diagnosis only
  • Loss to follow-up 21.6%

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
high
Rationale

Case series; no control group.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Descriptive only.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Growth failure in T1D arises from under-treatment (inadequate insulin effect) and improves when insulin management is intensified; relevant to Arab-region settings.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Mauriac syndrome is now rare in Europe; mechanism universal.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Low-quality but regionally relevant and mechanistically consistent.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biashigh
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks