Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-INTB-01 standard review

Review: how insulin works and how insulin resistance arises

Mechanisms of Insulin Action and Insulin Resistance.

Overview

Petersen MC, Shulman GI. Physiol Rev 2018 · PMID 30067154 · DOI 10.1152/physrev.00063.2017

Insulin resistance in muscle, liver and fat is a central process in type 2 diabetes; some mechanisms are still debated.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Summarise insulin action and resistance

How was the study done?

Narrative review

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Literature

What was actually found?

Insulin resistance is a key process in type 2 diabetes

How large was the observed effect?

not applicable

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Doctors and scientists treat insulin resistance as a real, measurable state.

What are the study's limitations?

Narrative; abstract only

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts 'there is no such thing as insulin resistance'.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Universal physiology

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Does not settle which mediator causes insulin resistance.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Petersen MC, Shulman GI
Journal
Physiol Rev
Year
2018
Identifier
PMID 30067154 DOI 10.1152/physrev.00063.2017
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Research Support, N.I.H. (publication type in PubMed record); no COI statement in record

2. Research question

What are the mechanisms of normal insulin action and of insulin resistance?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Narrative review – Comprehensive narrative review of insulin action and insulin resistance in muscle, liver and white adipose tissue
Population

Human and animal physiology literature

Country

not applicable

Period

literature up to 2018

Sample size

not applicable

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

not applicable

Comparator

not applicable

Endpoints

Mechanisms of insulin action and resistance

Statistical methods

none (narrative)

5. Actual results

Results

Describes insulin resistance as one of the key pathophysiological processes in type 2 diabetes; reviews evidence for and against putative mediators (diacylglycerol, ceramide, acylcarnitine, ER and mitochondrial stress, inflammatory mediators, branched-chain amino acids, adipokines, hepatokines) and proposes an integrated model linking them to metabolite-driven gluconeogenesis and ectopic lipid accumulation.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Insulin resistance is a key pathophysiological process in type 2 diabetes; several mediators remain controversial.

6. Strengths

  • Authoritative, comprehensive review by leading investigators of insulin action

7. Weaknesses

  • Narrative, not systematic
  • Abstract only read
  • Mechanistic; does not by itself quantify clinical outcomes

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Narrative review; no formal risk-of-bias tool applies.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Not a quantitative synthesis; used only to document that insulin resistance is an established, measurable and intensively studied phenomenon.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Contradicts the claim that insulin resistance does not exist.

11. Independent contrary findings

The review itself notes that some mechanisms remain controversial.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Physiology is universal.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Establishes insulin resistance as a recognised physiological concept; mechanisms are partly debated.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Which mediators are causal in humans.

15. Linked fact checks