Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-INTC-11 standard review

Fibromyalgia and obesity

Fibromyalgia and obesity: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview

D'Onghia M et al.. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021 · PMID 33676126 · DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.02.007

About one in three people with fibromyalgia has obesity; early studies suggest weight loss, including surgery, may ease symptoms.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Review FM and obesity

How was the study done?

Systematic review and meta-analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

41 studies

What was actually found?

Obesity common in FM; weight loss may help

How large was the observed effect?

Obesity prevalence 35.7% (31.8-39.9%)

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Losing weight may help fibromyalgia.

What are the study's limitations?

High risk of bias; few weight-loss studies

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Does not support 'surgery causes fibromyalgia'

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Proof of benefit or harm from sleeve gastrectomy

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
D'Onghia M et al.
Journal
Semin Arthritis Rheum
Year
2021
Identifier
PMID 33676126 DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.02.007
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Authors declare no competing interests.

2. Research question

What is the relationship between fibromyalgia and obesity, including the effect of weight loss?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis (41 studies)
Population

Patients with fibromyalgia

Country

International (higher figures in USA)

Period

Searches to September 2020

Sample size

41 articles

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

MedLine, CENTRAL, Web of Science

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Obesity; weight-loss strategies (bariatric surgery, diet/exercise, behavioural)

Comparator

Non-obese

Endpoints

Obesity prevalence in FM; FM severity domains

Statistical methods

Random-effects pooling of prevalence

5. Actual results

Results

Pooled prevalence of obesity in FM 35.7% (95% CI 31.8-39.9%). Obesity associated with pain severity, tender points, stiffness, fatigue, function, sleep, cognition and quality of life (weak correlations on average). Few studies on weight loss (bariatric surgery, diet/exercise, behavioural) gave preliminary evidence of benefit for FM symptoms. Overall risk of bias high.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Data support a potential interplay between obesity and FM symptoms; weight management should be encouraged.

6. Strengths

  • Comprehensive search
  • Meta-analysis of prevalence

7. Weaknesses

  • High risk of bias in included studies
  • Few weight-loss studies

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Informal judgement; authors report high risk of bias of primary studies.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Prevalence estimate fairly precise; weight-loss effect only preliminary.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Obesity is associated with worse fibromyalgia, and weight loss including bariatric surgery shows preliminary benefit; no signal that surgery causes fibromyalgia.

11. Independent contrary findings

None identified.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Limits the claim: the available direction of evidence is toward improvement, not causation.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biashigh
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Long-term FM outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy.

15. Linked fact checks