Cross-sectional studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-INTC-15 standard review

Instant noodles and metabolic health in Korea

Instant noodle intake and dietary patterns are associated with distinct cardiometabolic risk factors in Korea.

Overview

Shin HJ et al.. J Nutr 2014 · PMID 24966409 · DOI 10.3945/jn.113.188441

Women who ate instant noodles twice a week or more had metabolic syndrome more often (OR 1.68).

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test instant noodles vs cardiometabolic risk

How was the study done?

National cross-sectional survey

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

10,711 Korean adults

What was actually found?

Higher metabolic syndrome in women

How large was the observed effect?

OR 1.68 (1.10-2.55) in women

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Eating instant noodles often may not be good for metabolic health.

What are the study's limitations?

Cross-sectional; Korea

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports limiting noodles, not obstruction

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Low

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cause and effect

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Shin HJ et al.
Journal
J Nutr
Year
2014
Identifier
PMID 24966409 DOI 10.3945/jn.113.188441
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections

Erratum in: J Nutr. 2014 Dec;144(12):2094 (per PubMed record)

Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract (PubMed lists non-US government support); erratum published J Nutr 2014;144(12):2094

2. Research question

Is instant noodle intake associated with cardiometabolic risk independent of dietary patterns?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cross-sectional study – Cross-sectional analysis of a national survey (KNHANES IV)
Population

Adults 19-64 years

Country

South Korea

Period

2007-2009

Sample size

10,711 (54.5% women)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Nationally representative sample

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Instant noodles >=2 times/week; dietary patterns

Comparator

Lower intake

Endpoints

Metabolic syndrome and components

Statistical methods

Survey-weighted logistic regression

5. Actual results

Results

Instant noodles >=2 times/week associated with higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome in women (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.10-2.55) but not in men (OR 0.93; 0.58-1.49; P-interaction 0.04). Meat and fast-food pattern: abdominal obesity OR 1.41 (1.05-1.90), LDL >=130 mg/dL OR 1.57 (1.26-1.95).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Instant noodle consumption was associated with increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome in women, independent of major dietary patterns.

6. Strengths

  • Nationally representative
  • Adjusted for dietary patterns

7. Weaknesses

  • Cross-sectional
  • FFQ-based
  • Residual confounding

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
high
Rationale

Cross-sectional; reverse causation and confounding possible.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Association in women only; moderate precision.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows the relevant concerns about frequent instant-noodle intake are cardiometabolic (association with metabolic syndrome in women), not abdominal pressure or obstruction.

11. Independent contrary findings

Not reviewed.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Korean population; transferability limited.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports limiting instant noodles; does not support the obstruction claim.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biashigh
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceunknown
Regional transferabilitylow
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Causality; relevance to Egyptian diets.

15. Linked fact checks