Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-LEG-117 standard review

Diet and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis

Diet and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis - A systematic literature review.

Overview

Bäcklund R et al.. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2023 · PMID 36379128 · DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152118

Studies give no consistent picture; fish, vegetables and Mediterranean diets may protect, and legumes were not identified as a risk.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Review diet and RA risk.

How was the study done?

Systematic review.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

27 studies.

What was actually found?

Inconsistent; possible protective patterns.

How large was the observed effect?

Not pooled.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

There is no good evidence that particular foods such as legumes cause RA.

What are the study's limitations?

Heterogeneous.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

C-LEG-02 remains unsupported.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

It cannot exclude effects of single foods.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Bäcklund R et al.
Journal
Semin Arthritis Rheum
Year
2023
Identifier
PMID 36379128 DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152118
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref works API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No competing interests declared.

2. Research question

Which dietary patterns, foods and nutrients are related to the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Systematic literature review (no meta-analysis); Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment
Population

Cohort and case-control studies of RA risk

Country

International

Period

Not stated in abstract

Sample size

19 cohort-based and 8 case-control studies

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Temporal relation between diet and RA diagnosis required.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Dietary patterns, foods, food groups

Comparator

Varied

Endpoints

Incident RA

Statistical methods

Narrative synthesis

5. Actual results

Results

Possible protective effects of fish, vegetables and Mediterranean-style diets; results heterogeneous; no consistent evidence on the role of diet. No harmful association for legumes reported in the abstract.

Absolute risks

Not applicable

Authors' conclusion

There is a lack of consistent evidence on diet in RA development; more high-quality studies are needed.

6. Strengths

  • Dual independent selection and quality appraisal

7. Weaknesses

  • Heterogeneous exposures
  • Abstract only

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Narrative synthesis.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Not applicable.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows the diet-autoimmunity field is weakly studied; legumes are not identified as a risk factor for RA.

11. Independent contrary findings

None.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports 'insufficiently studied / not supported' rather than 'refuted'.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Legume-specific analyses for RA, lupus and MS.

15. Linked fact checks