Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-LEG-124 standard review

Vegetarian diets and iron stores

The effect of vegetarian diets on iron status in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview

Haider LM et al.. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2018 · PMID 27880062 · DOI 10.1080/10408398.2016.1259210

Adult vegetarians had lower iron stores than meat eaters.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Compare iron stores.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

24 studies.

What was actually found?

Lower ferritin in vegetarians.

How large was the observed effect?

-29.71 ug/L.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Meat-free diets need attention to iron.

What are the study's limitations?

Cross-sectional.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports C-LEG-08.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

It says nothing about legumes in mixed diets.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Haider LM et al.
Journal
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr
Year
2018
Identifier
PMID 27880062 DOI 10.1080/10408398.2016.1259210
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref works API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Not stated in abstract.

2. Research question

Do adult vegetarians have lower iron stores than non-vegetarians?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis (mainly cross-sectional studies)
Population

Adult vegetarians vs non-vegetarians

Country

International

Period

Not stated

Sample size

27 cross-sectional and 3 interventional studies (24 in meta-analysis)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies reporting serum ferritin.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Vegetarian diet

Comparator

Non-vegetarian diet

Endpoints

Serum ferritin

Statistical methods

Inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis

5. Actual results

Results

Vegetarians had lower serum ferritin (-29.71 ug/L, 95% CI -39.69 to -19.73); men -61.88, premenopausal women -17.70 ug/L.

Absolute risks

Not reported

Authors' conclusion

Vegetarians are more likely to have lower iron stores; everyone should monitor iron status and improve bioavailability.

6. Strengths

  • Quantitative synthesis

7. Weaknesses

  • Cross-sectional data
  • Whole-diet comparison, not legumes specifically
  • Abstract only

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Observational, confounding.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Lower stores, not necessarily more anaemia.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports the archive's point that plant-based diets supply less bioavailable iron (C-LEG-08), but concerns meat-free diets, not legumes eaten with a mixed diet.

11. Independent contrary findings

A-LEG-06 (balanced diet with animal protein: legumes not a mineral risk).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Relevant to vegetarians; irrelevant to banning legumes in mixed diets.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

None specific.

15. Linked fact checks