Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-LIFE-101 in-depth review
Eating less fat and body weight
Effects of total fat intake on body fatness in adults.
Overview
Hooper L et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020 · PMID 32476140 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD013636
People who ate less fat weighed about 1.4 kg less on average than those who ate more fat, even without trying to lose weight.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Assess fat intake and body fatness.
- How was the study done?
Cochrane review of 37 RCTs.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
57,079 adults.
- What was actually found?
Small weight reduction with less fat.
- How large was the observed effect?
MD -1.4 kg (-1.7 to -1.1).
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Fat is not the main driver of weight gain, but it is not irrelevant either.
- What are the study's limitations?
Small effect.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Partly limits the claim.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applies; same physiology.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Effects of very high fat intakes such as unlimited ghee.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Hooper L et al.
- Journal
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev
- Year
- 2020
- Identifier
- PMID 32476140 DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD013636
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref update-to/updated-by check
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
WHO funded part of the update (stated).
2. Research question
Does the proportion of energy from fat affect body fatness in people not aiming to lose weight?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Systematic review – Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs >=6 months
- Population
Adults not trying to lose weight
- Country
International
- Period
Search to Oct 2019
- Sample size
37 RCTs, 57,079 participants
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
not stated in abstract
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Lower fat intake
- Comparator
Higher (usual) fat intake
- Endpoints
Body weight, BMI, waist, % body fat, lipids, BP
- Statistical methods
Random effects MD; meta-regression; GRADE
5. Actual results
- Results
Lower fat: body weight MD -1.4 kg (95% CI -1.7 to -1.1; 26 RCTs, 53,875 participants; I2 75%), BMI -0.5 kg/m2 (-0.6 to -0.3), waist -0.5 cm (-0.7 to -0.2), body fat -0.3% (-0.6 to 0.00). Greater weight loss with greater fat reduction, lower baseline fat and higher baseline BMI.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
Consistent, stable but small effect of lower fat intake on body fatness.
6. Strengths
- Large RCT base; high consistency
- Participants not trying to lose weight
7. Weaknesses
- Heterogeneity (explained by subgroups)
- Small effect size
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- AMSTAR 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- low
- Rationale
High-quality review.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Effect small (1.4 kg); stats/I-LIFE-101_fat_body_weight.py.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Fat intake contributes a small amount to body weight - so fat is not irrelevant, but it is not 'the origin' of weight gain either.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Universal biology; applies in Europe and Egypt.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Limits the claim: fat share has a small, real effect.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | low |
| Precision of results | high |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
15. Linked fact checks
- Dietary fat is not the origin of weight accumulation. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim