Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-LIFE-101 in-depth review

Eating less fat and body weight

Effects of total fat intake on body fatness in adults.

Overview

Hooper L et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020 · PMID 32476140 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD013636

People who ate less fat weighed about 1.4 kg less on average than those who ate more fat, even without trying to lose weight.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Assess fat intake and body fatness.

How was the study done?

Cochrane review of 37 RCTs.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

57,079 adults.

What was actually found?

Small weight reduction with less fat.

How large was the observed effect?

MD -1.4 kg (-1.7 to -1.1).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Fat is not the main driver of weight gain, but it is not irrelevant either.

What are the study's limitations?

Small effect.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly limits the claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applies; same physiology.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Effects of very high fat intakes such as unlimited ghee.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Hooper L et al.
Journal
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Year
2020
Identifier
PMID 32476140 DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD013636
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref update-to/updated-by check
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

WHO funded part of the update (stated).

2. Research question

Does the proportion of energy from fat affect body fatness in people not aiming to lose weight?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs >=6 months
Population

Adults not trying to lose weight

Country

International

Period

Search to Oct 2019

Sample size

37 RCTs, 57,079 participants

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Lower fat intake

Comparator

Higher (usual) fat intake

Endpoints

Body weight, BMI, waist, % body fat, lipids, BP

Statistical methods

Random effects MD; meta-regression; GRADE

5. Actual results

Results

Lower fat: body weight MD -1.4 kg (95% CI -1.7 to -1.1; 26 RCTs, 53,875 participants; I2 75%), BMI -0.5 kg/m2 (-0.6 to -0.3), waist -0.5 cm (-0.7 to -0.2), body fat -0.3% (-0.6 to 0.00). Greater weight loss with greater fat reduction, lower baseline fat and higher baseline BMI.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Consistent, stable but small effect of lower fat intake on body fatness.

6. Strengths

  • Large RCT base; high consistency
  • Participants not trying to lose weight

7. Weaknesses

  • Heterogeneity (explained by subgroups)
  • Small effect size

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

High-quality review.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Effect small (1.4 kg); stats/I-LIFE-101_fat_body_weight.py.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Fat intake contributes a small amount to body weight - so fat is not irrelevant, but it is not 'the origin' of weight gain either.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Universal biology; applies in Europe and Egypt.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Limits the claim: fat share has a small, real effect.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks