Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-ODD-101 in-depth review

Metformin and blood acid build-up depend on kidney function

Association of Metformin Use With Risk of Lactic Acidosis Across the Range of Kidney Function: A Community-Based Cohort Study.

Overview

Lazarus B et al.. JAMA Intern Med 2018 · PMID 29868840 · DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0292

In 75,413 people, metformin was not linked to acidosis overall (HR 0.98) but was linked when kidney function was severely reduced (eGFR <30: HR 2.07).

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

To measure acidosis risk with metformin at different levels of kidney function.

How was the study done?

Health-record cohort with time-updated kidney function, replicated in a second large US data set.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

75,413 people with diabetes; replication with about 82,000 new users.

What was actually found?

No higher acidosis risk at eGFR 30 or above; about twice the risk below eGFR 30.

How large was the observed effect?

HR 0.98 overall; HR 2.07 (1.33-3.22) at eGFR <30.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Metformin is safe for most kidneys; doctors stop it when kidney function becomes very poor.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational; acidosis code is not specific for metformin-related lactic acidosis.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts 'automatic' lactic acidosis; confirms a risk in a contraindicated situation.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High; same drug and thresholds.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

It cannot exclude rare cases during acute illness or dehydration.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Lazarus B et al.
Journal
JAMA Intern Med
Year
2018
Identifier
PMID 29868840 DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0292
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural (PubMed record); individual disclosures not reviewed (abstract only).

2. Research question

Is metformin use associated with hospitalisation with acidosis across the range of kidney function (eGFR)?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Community-based cohort with time-dependent exposure and eGFR stage, plus a replication cohort of new users
Population

Adults with diabetes in the Geisinger Health System; replication in new metformin and sulfonylurea users from 350 US health systems

Country

USA

Period

2004-2017 (primary); 2010-2015 (replication)

Sample size

75,413 (primary); 67,578 new metformin and 14,439 new sulfonylurea users (replication)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients with diabetes; time-dependent eGFR stage

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Time-dependent metformin use

Comparator

Alternative diabetes management; new sulfonylurea users in replication

Endpoints

Hospitalisation with acidosis (ICD-9-CM 276.2)

Statistical methods

Cox models with time-dependent exposure and eGFR; propensity-matched and new-user sensitivity analyses

5. Actual results

Results

2,335 hospitalisations with acidosis over median 5.7 years. Overall adjusted HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.89-1.08); eGFR 45-59: HR 1.16 (0.95-1.41); eGFR 30-44: HR 1.09 (0.83-1.44); eGFR <30: HR 2.07 (1.33-3.22). Consistent in new-user comparison with sulfonylureas (eGFR 30-44: HR 0.77, 0.29-2.05), propensity-matched cohort (0.71, 0.45-1.12) and replication cohort (0.86, 0.37-2.01).

Absolute risks

Not reported in the abstract (event count 2,335 across all users; group-specific rates not given).

Authors' conclusion

Metformin use was associated with acidosis only at eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2; results support cautious use at eGFR of at least 30.

6. Strengths

  • Large real-world cohort with time-updated kidney function
  • Replication in an independent multi-system cohort
  • Several sensitivity analyses (new users, propensity matching, exclusion of insulin users)

7. Weaknesses

  • Outcome is an administrative code for acidosis of any cause, not adjudicated metformin-associated lactic acidosis
  • Observational; residual confounding by indication possible
  • Abstract only reviewed

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Confounding by indication and outcome misclassification possible; direction of bias for the eGFR<30 subgroup unclear.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Hazard ratio CIs are log-symmetric (stats/C-ODD-01.py). The overall null result is precise (upper limit 1.08). The eGFR<30 signal is consistent with the pharmacology (renal clearance).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Directly tests whether metformin causes acidosis 'automatically': it does not in normal or moderately reduced kidney function; risk rises only in severe kidney impairment, which is a contraindication.

11. Independent contrary findings

Inzucchi 2014 (I-ODD-102) and Cochrane 2010 (I-ODD-08) find incidence indistinguishable from background.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Biology and eGFR thresholds are universal; EU labels use the same eGFR limits.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Good-quality evidence that the lactic acidosis risk is confined to situations with severely reduced kidney function.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Risk during acute kidney injury and dehydration (e.g. prolonged fasting) is not separately quantified.

15. Linked fact checks