Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-ORG-138 in-depth review

Early surgical menopause and dementia

Surgical menopause in association with cognitive function and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview

Georgakis MK et al.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019 · PMID 30928686 · DOI 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.03.013

Removing both ovaries at 45 or younger was linked to a higher risk of dementia; surgery at any age was not clearly linked.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Pool studies on surgical menopause and cognition

How was the study done?

Systematic review and meta-analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

11 studies, 18,867 women

What was actually found?

Higher dementia risk only with surgery at <= 45

How large was the observed effect?

HR 1.70 (1.07-2.69)

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Age at surgery matters

What are the study's limitations?

Only 2 studies for main estimate

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the claim's age condition

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot prove causation

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Georgakis MK et al.
Journal
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Year
2019
Identifier
PMID 30928686 DOI 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.03.013
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Non-commercial support (PubMed).

2. Research question

Is surgical menopause (bilateral oophorectomy before menopause) associated with dementia and cognitive decline?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Population

Women in observational studies

Country

Multinational

Period

Not stated in abstract

Sample size

11 studies, N = 18,867

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies of surgical menopause and dementia/cognition

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Surgical menopause

Comparator

Natural menopause / no surgery

Endpoints

Dementia, cognitive performance/decline, AD neuropathology

Statistical methods

Random-effects; Newcastle-Ottawa

5. Actual results

Results

Surgical menopause at any age not associated with dementia (4 studies; HR 1.16, 0.96-1.43); early surgical menopause (<= 45 years) associated with higher risk (2 studies; HR 1.70, 1.07-2.69). Faster decline in verbal memory, semantic memory and processing speed; younger age at surgery associated with faster decline and more AD neuropathology. No heterogeneity.

Absolute risks

Not reported

Authors' conclusion

Evidence is limited but suggests surgical menopause at <= 45 years is associated with higher dementia risk and cognitive decline; replication needed.

6. Strengths

  • Systematic
  • Age-specific analysis

7. Weaknesses

  • Only 2 studies for the early-menopause estimate
  • Observational

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Few studies; quality assessed with NOS.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

HR 1.70 CI log-symmetric but wide; based on 2 studies.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports the age gradient described in the claim (Rocca 2007).

11. Independent contrary findings

Fu 2026 (I-ORG-139) and Uldbjerg 2022 (I-ORG-140) found no clear or imprecise associations.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Includes European studies.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports the claim for oophorectomy at <= 45 years; not for surgery at any age.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Role of estrogen therapy.

15. Linked fact checks