Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-PPI-04 in-depth review

How to stop PPIs safely (AGA 2022)

AGA Clinical Practice Update on De-Prescribing of Proton Pump Inhibitors: Expert Review.

Overview

Targownik LE et al.. Gastroenterology 2022 · PMID 35183361 · DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.247

Stop PPIs without a definite indication; keep them in Barrett's, severe oesophagitis and high bleeding risk; expect temporary rebound.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

De-prescribing guidance.

How was the study done?

Expert review.

What was actually found?

10 statements.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Many people can stop; some must not.

What are the study's limitations?

Expert opinion.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports overuse claim; contradicts universal ban and 'cannot stop'.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Targownik LE et al.
Journal
Gastroenterology
Year
2022
Identifier
PMID 35183361 DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.247
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

How to approach PPI de-prescribing in ambulatory patients

3. Study design and population

Study design
Guideline / position statement – Clinical practice update / expert review (AGA)
Population

Ambulatory PPI users

Country

USA

Period

2022

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

PPI de-prescribing

Endpoints

Best practice advice

Statistical methods

Non-systematic literature review; consensus

5. Actual results

Results

BPA 1–10: document indication; trial of de-prescribing if no definitive indication; step down twice-daily; do not stop in complicated GERD, Barrett's, EoE, IPF, high UGI bleeding risk; warn about transient rebound; taper or abrupt stop both possible; decide on indication, not fear of PPI-associated adverse events.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

PPIs are generally safe; patients should not use them without expected benefit.

6. Strengths

  • Practical
  • Explicit exclusions

7. Weaknesses

  • Not a systematic review; no formal evidence grading

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Expert opinion.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-PPI-06, -07, -10, -11.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Clear guidance on when to stop and when not to.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks