Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-PPI-104 in-depth review

Stopping an acid blocker caused short-lived indigestion in healthy people

Dyspeptic symptom development after discontinuation of a proton pump inhibitor: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Overview

Niklasson A et al.. Am J Gastroenterol 2010 · PMID 20332770 · DOI 10.1038/ajg.2010.81

After 4 weeks of pantoprazole, 44% of healthy volunteers developed indigestion when they stopped, compared with 9% after placebo; it faded within 3 weeks.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test for rebound after stopping a PPI.

How was the study done?

Double-blind RCT.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

48 healthy volunteers.

What was actually found?

44% vs 9% developed indigestion; gone by week 3.

How large was the observed effect?

RR about 5; NNH about 3.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Expect a few weeks of symptoms after stopping; it does not mean you need the drug.

What are the study's limitations?

Small; short treatment.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports rebound claim; limits 'dependence' claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show permanent dependence.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Niklasson A et al.
Journal
Am J Gastroenterol
Year
2010
Identifier
PMID 20332770 DOI 10.1038/ajg.2010.81
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Does stopping a 4-week course of pantoprazole cause dyspeptic symptoms in healthy people?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial in healthy volunteers
Population

48 healthy H. pylori-negative volunteers (24 women)

Country

Sweden

Period

Published 2010

Sample size

48 (25 pantoprazole, 23 placebo)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Healthy, H. pylori-negative

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Pantoprazole 40 mg daily for 28 days, then stop

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoints

Glasgow dyspepsia score for 6 weeks after stopping; gastrin, chromogranin A

Statistical methods

Group comparisons; correlation with gastrin

5. Actual results

Results

Week 1 after stopping: mean score 5.7 +/- 11.7 vs 0.74 +/- 2.6 (P<0.01); 11/25 (44%) vs 2/23 (9%) developed dyspepsia (P<0.01); week 2: 1.6 vs 0 (P<0.05); no difference in week 3. Symptoms correlated with end-of-treatment gastrin.

Absolute risks

44% vs 9% developed dyspepsia

Authors' conclusion

A 4-week course of pantoprazole seems to induce dyspeptic symptoms in previously asymptomatic people, probably via rebound acid hypersecretion.

6. Strengths

  • Double-blind placebo control
  • Healthy participants avoid disease relapse confounding

7. Weaknesses

  • Small
  • Short treatment
  • Transient effect

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

Blinded; small sample.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Recomputed RR 5.06 (1.25-20.4), RD 35 points, NNH about 3 (stats/C-PPI-06_07_rebound_discontinuation.py); effect gone by week 3.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Independent replication of Reimer 2009: stopping a PPI can cause new, short-lived symptoms in people who had none.

11. Independent contrary findings

Symptoms resolved by week 3.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Confirms C-PPI-06; shows transience relevant to C-PPI-07.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Rebound after years of use.

15. Linked fact checks