Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study I-PPI-106 in-depth review

Most people could stop unnecessary acid blockers

An App-Based Proton Pump Inhibitor Discontinuation Tool: A Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Superiority Trial.

Overview

Koggel LM et al.. United European Gastroenterol J 2026 · PMID 42894466 · DOI 10.1002/ueg2.70297

Among outpatients without a reason for long-term PPIs, 86% using an app and 64% using a leaflet had stopped after 2 months.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Help people stop unneeded PPIs.

How was the study done?

Randomised trial, app vs brochure.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

163 Dutch outpatients.

What was actually found?

86% vs 64% stopped; few side effects.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 1.34 (1.11-1.61).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Stopping is usually possible with good information.

What are the study's limitations?

Short follow-up; self-report.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts 'cannot stop'.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Directly applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot tell how many restart later.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Koggel LM et al.
Journal
United European Gastroenterol J
Year
2026
Identifier
PMID 42894466 DOI 10.1002/ueg2.70297
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
full text
Conflicts of interest and funding

No sponsor or funder; one author co-founded the app company; others report industry funding unrelated (full text)

2. Research question

Does an app-based discontinuation tool improve stopping of PPIs used without a chronic indication?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Multicentre, open-label, adaptive randomised superiority trial
Population

Adults using daily PPI >=4 weeks without chronic indication (Dutch GP guideline), outpatients of 3 Dutch hospitals

Country

Netherlands

Period

May 2022 - March 2023

Sample size

174 randomised; 163 analysed

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Excluded if physician deemed PPI necessary, prior upper GI surgery, no smartphone, limited life expectancy

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

App with information and tapering guidance

Comparator

Information brochure

Endpoints

Discontinuation at 2 months (<=1 tablet in prior 14 days); adverse events

Statistical methods

Risk ratio; adaptive sample size with Pocock-type correction

5. Actual results

Results

Discontinued: 66/77 (86%) app vs 55/86 (64%) brochure; RR 1.34 (1.11-1.61). Adverse events 18/121 (15%) of those who stopped vs 6/42 (14%) who did not; 4/121 (3%) possibly attributable to discontinuation.

Absolute risks

64-86% stopped within 2 months; 3% had adverse events possibly due to stopping

Authors' conclusion

An app-based intervention significantly improves discontinuation of inappropriate PPI use compared with a brochure.

6. Strengths

  • Randomised
  • Patients without indication (target group)
  • Full text read

7. Weaknesses

  • Open label, self-reported outcome
  • Only 2-month follow-up
  • Mid-trial sample-size adaptation
  • App developer among authors

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Self-reported outcome, unblinded, sample size adaptation.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Recomputed RR 1.34 (1.12-1.61) matches; Wilson CI for brochure arm 53%-73% (stats/C-PPI-06_07_rebound_discontinuation.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Direct evidence that most people taking PPIs without an indication can stop within 2 months, even with only a brochure.

11. Independent contrary findings

Long-term relapse unknown.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly applicable to Europe.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Strong contradiction of 'one cannot stop'.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Sustained discontinuation beyond 2 months.

15. Linked fact checks