Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-SOD-03 in-depth review
Sweeteners and blood sugar: a 120-person trial
Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance.
Overview
Suez J et al.. Cell 2022 · PMID 35987213 · DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2022.07.016
Saccharin and sucralose worsened glucose responses in some people; aspartame and stevia did not significantly.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Do NNS causally affect human microbiome and glycaemic responses?
- How was the study done?
Randomized controlled trial (2 weeks) plus gnotobiotic mouse transfer.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
120; Healthy adults
- What was actually found?
Each NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome; saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycaemic responses; responder-specific effects reproduced in mice.
- How large was the observed effect?
Qualitative (numbers not in abstract)
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Some sweeteners affect some people.
- What are the study's limitations?
Short (2 weeks); Clinical relevance unknown; Authors' commercial interests
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Mixed for C-SOD-07.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Long-term disease risk.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Suez J et al.
- Journal
- Cell
- Year
- 2022
- Identifier
- PMID 35987213 DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2022.07.016
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
Some authors co-founders of DayTwo/BiomX
2. Research question
Do NNS causally affect human microbiome and glycaemic responses?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Randomised controlled trial – Randomized controlled trial (2 weeks) plus gnotobiotic mouse transfer.
- Population
Healthy adults
- Country
Israel
- Period
not stated in abstract
- Sample size
120
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
not stated in abstract
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, stevia sachets below ADI
- Comparator
Glucose vehicle or no supplement
- Endpoints
Microbiome, metabolome, glycaemic responses
- Statistical methods
Group comparisons; mouse transfer
5. Actual results
- Results
Each NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome; saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycaemic responses; responder-specific effects reproduced in mice.
- Absolute risks
not applicable
- Authors' conclusion
NNS may induce person-specific, microbiome-dependent glycaemic alterations.
6. Strengths
- Randomized
- Causal mouse transfer
7. Weaknesses
- Short (2 weeks)
- Clinical relevance unknown
- Authors' commercial interests
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- RoB 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Industry ties; multiple comparisons.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Effects sweetener-specific.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Mixed for C-SOD-07.
11. Independent contrary findings
Aspartame and stevia without significant glycaemic impairment.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
High.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Best human evidence on NNS and microbiome.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | mixed |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Long-term effects.
15. Linked fact checks
- Artificial sweeteners disturb the beneficial gut bacteria and thereby induce glucose intolerance in animals and humans. – Studies with mixed or unclear results