Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-SOD-07 standard review

Sugary drinks and bone density: meta-analysis

Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview

Ahn H, Park YK. Nutr J 2021 · PMID 33952276 · DOI 10.1186/s12937-021-00698-1

Higher sugary and fizzy drink intake was linked with lower bone density in adults.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Is SSB consumption associated with bone health?

How was the study done?

Systematic review and meta-analysis (mainly observational).

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

26 publications; 124,691 participants (meta-analysis n=4,312); Children and adults

What was actually found?

Adults: ES -0.66 (-1.01 to -0.31); carbonated beverages ES -0.73 (-1.12 to -0.35); 18 of 20 qualitative studies supportive.

How large was the observed effect?

ES -0.66

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Association only.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational; Small meta-analysed sample; Large SMDs suggest heterogeneity

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports direction of C-SOD-08 (not mechanism).

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

That phosphoric acid causes bone loss.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Ahn H, Park YK
Journal
Nutr J
Year
2021
Identifier
PMID 33952276 DOI 10.1186/s12937-021-00698-1
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Authors declared no competing interests

2. Research question

Is SSB consumption associated with bone health?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis (mainly observational).
Population

Children and adults

Country

Multinational

Period

Literature to March 2021

Sample size

26 publications; 124,691 participants (meta-analysis n=4,312)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

SSB/carbonated beverages

Comparator

Lower intake

Endpoints

BMD

Statistical methods

Random effects SMD

5. Actual results

Results

Adults: ES -0.66 (-1.01 to -0.31); carbonated beverages ES -0.73 (-1.12 to -0.35); 18 of 20 qualitative studies supportive.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

SSB such as carbonated beverages inversely related to BMD in adults.

6. Strengths

  • PROSPERO-registered

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational
  • Small meta-analysed sample
  • Large SMDs suggest heterogeneity

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Observational base.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Large standardised effects need caution.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports direction of C-SOD-08 (not mechanism).

11. Independent contrary findings

None.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Moderate.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supportive, low certainty.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Causality; fractures.

15. Linked fact checks