Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-SOD-104 in-depth review
No dementia link for diet drinks in older adults
Sweetened Beverages and Incident All-Cause Dementia Among Older Adults.
Overview
Chen H et al.. JAMA Psychiatry 2025 · PMID 40531522 · DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.1230
Across six US cohorts with about 11,000 older adults, diet drinks were not linked to dementia (HR 1.00).
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Test whether sweetened drinks predict dementia in older adults.
- How was the study done?
Pooled six long-term cohorts.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
10,974 adults aged 65+; 2445 dementia cases.
- What was actually found?
No association for sugary or diet drinks.
- How large was the observed effect?
ASB >=1/day HR 1.00 (0.83-1.21).
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Fear of tripled dementia risk from diet soda is not supported.
- What are the study's limitations?
Late-life intake only.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts the claim.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applicable.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot exclude effects of drinking diet soda in midlife.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Chen H et al.
- Journal
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Year
- 2025
- Identifier
- PMID 40531522 DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.1230
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
NIA/NIH grants (PubMed record)
2. Research question
Is SSB or ASB intake associated with all-cause dementia in older adults?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cohort study – Multicohort prospective analysis of six US cohorts with pooled Cox models
- Population
US adults aged >=65 (HRS, ARIC, CHAP, MAP, Framingham original and offspring)
- Country
USA
- Period
Baselines 1986-2013
- Sample size
10,974; 2445 incident dementia cases; 116,067 person-years
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Aged >=65, dementia-free at baseline; dementia ascertained >=2 years after baseline
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
SSB and ASB servings (validated FFQs)
- Comparator
0 to <1 serving/month
- Endpoints
Incident all-cause dementia
- Statistical methods
Cohort-specific Cox models pooled by meta-analysis
5. Actual results
- Results
Per serving/week: SSB HR 0.99 (0.98-1.01; I2 0%); ASB HR 1.00 (0.99-1.01; I2 1%). Highest (>=1/day) vs lowest: SSB HR 0.90 (0.78-1.03); ASB HR 1.00 (0.83-1.21). Positive control: Mediterranean diet HR 0.92 per 5 units.
- Absolute risks
not reported in abstract
- Authors' conclusion
Late-life consumption of SSB or ASB was not associated with dementia risk.
6. Strengths
- Six cohorts; 2445 cases
- Low heterogeneity
- Positive-control exposure behaved as expected
7. Weaknesses
- Late-life exposure only
- Alzheimer subtype not separately reported in abstract
- Includes Framingham offspring, overlapping with Pase 2017
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Observational; exposure in late life.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Weight of evidence ~23 times that of Pase's AD estimate (stats/C-SOD-06_stroke_dementia.py); the 'nearly triple' dementia estimate is not reproduced.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Directly contradicts the 'nearly triples dementia' part of C-SOD-06.
11. Independent contrary findings
Jouni 2025 meta-analysis (I-SOD-105) reported ASB-AD RR 1.42.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Applicable to older adults.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Large, precise null result for dementia in older adults.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | high |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | mixed |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Midlife exposure; Alzheimer-specific outcomes.
15. Linked fact checks
- One diet soda per day nearly triples the risk of ischaemic stroke and of Alzheimer's dementia. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim