Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-SOD-123 standard review

Soda linked to more hip fractures, cola or not

Soda consumption and risk of hip fractures in postmenopausal women in the Nurses' Health Study.

Overview

Fung TT et al.. Am J Clin Nutr 2014 · PMID 25099544 · DOI 10.3945/ajcn.114.083352

In 73,572 US nurses, each daily soda was linked to 14% more hip fractures; colas were not worse than other sodas.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Examine soda and hip fractures.

How was the study done?

Prospective cohort over up to 30 years.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

73,572 women; 1873 fractures.

What was actually found?

More soda, more fractures; regular and diet alike; cola not special.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 1.14 per serving/day.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Soda may be a marker of risk; phosphoric acid not shown to be the cause.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Weakens the phosphoric-acid explanation.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot prove causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Fung TT et al.
Journal
Am J Clin Nutr
Year
2014
Identifier
PMID 25099544 DOI 10.3945/ajcn.114.083352
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NIH grants (PubMed record)

2. Research question

Is soda consumption associated with hip fracture in postmenopausal women?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort with repeated FFQs, up to 30 years
Population

Postmenopausal US women (Nurses' Health Study)

Country

USA

Period

Up to 30 years of follow-up

Sample size

73,572; 1873 hip fractures

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Postmenopausal women in NHS

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Total, regular, diet, cola and non-cola soda

Comparator

Lower intake

Endpoints

Incident hip fracture

Statistical methods

Cox models with confounder adjustment

5. Actual results

Results

Each additional serving/day of total soda: RR 1.14 (1.06-1.23). Regular soda RR 1.19 (1.02-1.38); diet soda RR 1.12 (1.03-1.21). Associations did not differ significantly between colas and non-colas, or caffeinated and caffeine-free sodas. Attributable risk 12.5%.

Absolute risks

Crude cumulative proportion 2.5% (1873/73,572) over up to 30 years (recalculated)

Authors' conclusion

Increased soda consumption of all types may be associated with increased hip fracture risk; a clear mechanism was not apparent.

6. Strengths

  • Large prospective cohort
  • Repeated diet measures
  • Hard outcome

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational
  • Women only
  • Mechanism unclear

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Residual confounding (milk displacement, lifestyle).

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

No cola-specific signal, which argues against a phosphoric-acid-specific mechanism.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Mixed for C-SOD-08: soda is associated with more hip fractures, but cola and non-cola sodas were similar, so phosphoric acid is not supported as the explanation.

11. Independent contrary findings

Heaney 2001 (I-SOD-124).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Association with a hard outcome; mechanism not identified.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Role of milk displacement and caffeine.

15. Linked fact checks