Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-SRC-128 standard review
Insulin sensitivity falls years before diabetes
Trajectories of glycaemia, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion before diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the Whitehall II study.
Overview
Tabák AG et al.. Lancet 2009 · PMID 19515410 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60619-X
In 6538 British adults, those who later got diabetes showed falling insulin sensitivity in the 5 years before diagnosis.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Track metabolism before diabetes
- How was the study done?
Cohort
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
6538 adults
- What was actually found?
Insulin sensitivity fell before diagnosis
- How large was the observed effect?
HOMA-S to 86.7%
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Insulin resistance is a measurable early warning sign
- What are the study's limitations?
HOMA not clamp
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts denial
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Tabák AG et al.
- Journal
- Lancet
- Year
- 2009
- Identifier
- PMID 19515410 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60619-X
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works record checked
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
No conflicts declared; public funders.
2. Research question
How do glucose, insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion change in the years before diagnosis of type 2 diabetes?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cohort study – Prospective occupational cohort (Whitehall II), retrospective trajectory analysis
- Population
British civil servants without diabetes at baseline
- Country
UK
- Period
Median follow-up 9.7 years
- Sample size
6538; 505 incident diabetes cases
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
No diabetes at baseline
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Time before diagnosis
- Comparator
Non-diabetic participants
- Endpoints
Fasting/2-h glucose, HOMA insulin sensitivity, HOMA beta-cell function
- Statistical methods
Multilevel models
5. Actual results
- Results
In those who developed diabetes, HOMA insulin sensitivity decreased steeply during the 5 years before diagnosis (to 86.7%); beta-cell function rose between years 4 and 3 before diagnosis (85.0% to 92.6%) and then fell to 62.4%; fasting glucose rose steeply from 3 years before diagnosis (5.79 to 7.40 mmol/L).
- Absolute risks
not applicable
- Authors' conclusion
Changes in glucose, insulin sensitivity and secretion occur 3-6 years before diagnosis.
6. Strengths
- Large cohort
- Repeated measures
7. Weaknesses
- HOMA indices, not clamp
- Mostly white men
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- low
- Rationale
Prospective, repeated measures.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Descriptive trajectories; temporal ordering supports insulin resistance as an early process.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Shows measurable decline in insulin sensitivity before type 2 diabetes in a large population.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
UK cohort, applicable.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Strong cohort evidence that insulin resistance exists and precedes diabetes.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | low |
| Precision of results | high |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
15. Linked fact checks
- 'Insulin resistance' is a wrong term; there is no such thing as insulin resistance. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim