Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-SRC-134 standard review

International kidney disease guideline 2024

KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Overview

KDIGO CKD Work Group. Kidney Int 2024 · PMID 38490803 · DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018

Recommends supervised diet changes and kidney-protective drugs for chronic kidney disease.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Guide CKD care

How was the study done?

GRADE guideline

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

not applicable

What was actually found?

Protein about 0.8 g/kg/day; salt limits; SGLT2 inhibitors

How large was the observed effect?

not applicable

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Kidney disease care is long term and supervised

What are the study's limitations?

Only parts read

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts quick cures

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
KDIGO CKD Work Group
Journal
Kidney Int
Year
2024
Identifier
PMID 38490803 DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works record checked; no abstract in PubMed; recommendation statements read from https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/KDIGO-2024-CKD-Guideline.pdf (fetched 2026-10-26)
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

See guideline disclosures (not reviewed here).

2. Research question

How should CKD be evaluated and managed (not on kidney replacement therapy)?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Guideline / position statement – International clinical practice guideline (GRADE)
Population

Adults and children with CKD

Country

International

Period

2024

Sample size

not applicable

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not applicable

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Diet, medication, risk management

Comparator

not applicable

Endpoints

Recommendations

Statistical methods

GRADE

5. Actual results

Results

Recommendation 3.3.1.1: suggest maintaining protein intake of 0.8 g/kg/day in adults with CKD G3-G5 (2C). Practice point: very low-protein diets (0.3-0.4 g/kg/day) with keto-analogues only under close supervision in selected adults at risk of kidney failure; not in metabolically unstable people; do not restrict protein in children. Recommendation 3.3.2.1: sodium <2 g/day (2C). Recommendation 3.7.1: SGLT2 inhibitor for T2D with CKD and eGFR >=20 (1A).

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

CKD management combines risk-based monitoring, diet adapted to stage, blood pressure and glucose control, and kidney-protective drugs.

6. Strengths

  • International, GRADE-based, current

7. Weaknesses

  • Only selected recommendations read

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Guideline.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Not applicable.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Current standard: CKD is managed long term with diet and drugs; dietary measures are supervised and gradual; nothing suggests reversal of kidney failure within months.

11. Independent contrary findings

None.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Used internationally, including Europe and Egypt.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Reference guideline.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks